Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with two different post systems

谭建国,冯敏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-7632.2005.01.004
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with two post systems, comparing different moduli of elasticity. Methods Twenty recently extracted human maxillary central incisors were endodontically treated and randomly divided into two groups of ten each. Teeth in group-1 received glass fiber posts (ParaPost Fiber White (Coltene/ Whaledent Inc), composite resin cores, and full crown casts. Teeth in group - 2 received cast Ni-Cr posts and cores and full crown casts. About 1. 5mm ferrule was prepared for each of the teeth. Each specimen was embedded in acrylic resin and secured in a universal material testing machine. A compressive load was applied on the lingual surface at a 130 - degree angle to the long axis of the tooth until fracture occurred, at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min) . Independent sample t-test were used to determine the significance of the fracture loads between the two groups ( P 0.05). Fisher's exact test was conducted for evaluation of the mode of failure ( P 0.05). Results The fracture loads were 43.406±18.959kg and 33.680±9.675kg for groups-1 and groups- 1, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P 0.05). Repairable fractures were observed in group - 1; whereas un - repairable fractures were observed in group - 2 ( P 0. 001) . Conclusion When a 1. 5 mm ferrule was preserved, two post systems with different modules of elasticity had no significant influence on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with full crowns. Repairable fractures were observed in teeth restored with glass fiber posts, which had similar modulus of elasticity to that of dentin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?