Abstract:Purpose: To quantify interfractional anatomical variations and their dosimetric impact during the course of fractionated proton therapy (PT) of prostate cancer and to assess the robustness of the current treatment planning techniques.Methods: Simulation and daily in-room CT scans from ten prostate carcinoma patients were analyzed. PT treatment plans (78 Gy in 39 fractions of 2 Gy) were created on the simulation CT, delivering 25 fractions to PTV1 (expanded from prostate and seminal vesicles), followed by 14 boost fractions to PTV2 (expanded from prostate). Plans were subsequently applied to daily CT, with beams aligned to the prostate center in the sagittal plane. For five patients having a sufficiently large daily imaging volume, structure contours were manually drawn, and plans were evaluated for all CT sets. For the other five patients, the plans were evaluated for six selected fractions. The daily CT was matched to the simulation CT through deformable registration. The registration accuracy was validated for each fraction, and the three patients with a large number of accurately registered fractions were used for dose accumulation.Results: In individual fractions, the coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and PTV1 was generally maintained at the corresponding prescription dose. For PTV2, the volume covered by the fractional prescription dose of 2 Gy (i.e., V2) was, on average, reduced by less than 3% compared to the simulation plan. Among the 225 (39 x 5 + 6 x 5) fractions examined, 15 showed a V2 reduction larger than 5%, of which ten were caused by a large variation in rectal gas, and five were due to a prostate shift in the craniocaudal direction. The fractional dose to the anterior rectal wall was found to increase for one patient who had large rectal gas volume in 25 of the 39 fractions, and another who experienced significant prostate volume reduction during the treatment. The fractional bladder dose generally increased with decreasing fullness. In the total accumulated dose for the three patients after excluding a few fractions with inaccurate registration due to a large amount of rectal gas (a condition inconsistent with RTOG protocol), 98.5%, 96.6%, and 98.2% of the PTV2 received the prescription dose of 78 Gy. The V75 and V70 of the anterior rectal wall and bladder both remained within tolerance.Conclusions: The results confirm that the PT planning techniques and dose constraints used at our institution ensure that target coverage to the prescription dose is maintained in the presence of interfractional anatomical variations. Dose coverage in individual fractions can be compromised, and normal tissue dose increased, due to deviations in the bladder and rectal volume compared to the simulation plans or progressive changes in the prostate volume during the treatment. Deviations from the plan can be reduced with efforts aimed at maintaining consistent daily patient anatomy. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3604152]

The Impact of Set-Up Errors on Dose Distribution During the Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Prostate Cancer

The Preliminary Study of Setup Errors' Impact on Dose Distribution of Image Guide Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

The impact of setup errors on dose distribution in cervical cancer radiotherapy and the margin from CTV to PTV

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Effects of Bladder and Rectum Management on Dose Distributions of Target and Organs at Risk in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Impact of setup errors on the robustness of linac‐based single‐isocenter coplanar and non‐coplanar VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases

Effects of error on dose of target region and organs at risk in treating nasopharynx cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy

Effects of the Setup Error on the Physics Dose for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Dosimetric Benefit of Implanted Marker-Based Cbct Setup for Definitive Prostatic Radiotherapy

A Clinical Evaluation of Setup Errors in IMRT Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

Cone-beam CT Scanning in Study of Setup Margin for Pelvic Carcinoma Irradiation

Set-up errors in three-dimensional conformal/intensity-modulated radiation therapy measured with repeat CT scans for reducing taget volume

Systematic setup errors for intensity modulated radiation therapy in the nasopharyngeal carcinoma:effect on dose distribution

EPID for Set-up Errors Analysis and Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Analysis of set-up errors during radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Setup Errors Analysis and Quality Control in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Tumors

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Set-up errors in radiation therapy for pelvic tumor patients of different somatotypes

Impact of treatment set-up errors on accuracy of post-operation radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine