Abstract:Background The cone beam CT (CBCT) guided radiation can reduce the systematic and random setup errors as compared to the skin-mark setup. However, the residual and intrafractional (RAIF) errors are still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the magnitude of RAIF errors and correction action levels needed in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Methods Ten patients were enrolled in the prospective study of CBCT guided APBI. The postoperative tumor bed was irradiated with 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Two cone-beam CT data sets were obtained with one before and one after the treatment delivery. The CBCT images were registered online to the planning CT images using the automatic algorithm followed by a fine manual adjustment. An action level of 3 mm, meaning that corrections were performed for translations exceeding 3 mm, was implemented in clinical treatments. Based on the acquired data, different correction action levels were simulated, and random RAIF errors, systematic RAIF errors and related margins before and after the treatments were determined for varying correction action levels. Results A total of 75 pairs of CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic and random setup errors based on skin-mark setup prior to treatment delivery were 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm in the lateral (LR), 3.1 mm and 2.3 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 2.3 mm and 2.0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. With the 3 mm correction action level, the systematic and random RAIF errors were 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm in the LR direction, 2.3 mm and 2.3 mm in the SI direction, and 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm in the AP direction after treatments delivery. Accordingly, the margins for correction action levels of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and no correction were 7.9 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 7.9 mm and 8.0 mm in the LR direction; 6.4 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.2 mm and 10.5 mm in the SI direction; 7.6 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.4 mm, 10.1 mm and 12.7 mm in the AP direction, respectively. Conclusions Residual and intrafractional errors can significantly affect the accuracy of image-guided APBI with nonplanar 3DCRT techniques. If a 10-mm CTV-PTV margin is applied, a correction action level of 5 mm or less is necessary so as to maintain the RAIF errors within 10 mm for more than 95% of fractions. Pre-treatment CBCT guidance is not a guarantee for safe delivery of the treatment despite its known benefits of reducing the initial setup errors. A patient position verification and correction during the treatment may be a method for the safe delivery.

Impact of treatment set-up errors on accuracy of post-operation radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Setup Errors Analysis and Quality Control in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Tumors

Analysis of set-up errors during radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Inter- and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of fiducial markers in patients with liver tumors receiving free-breathing postoperative radiation analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography.

Set-up errors in three-dimensional conformal/intensity-modulated radiation therapy measured with repeat CT scans for reducing taget volume

The Preliminary Study of Setup Errors' Impact on Dose Distribution of Image Guide Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Impact of Residual and Intrafractional Errors on Strategy of Correction for Image-Guided Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

EPID for Set-up Errors Analysis and Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Analysis of Position Verification Result of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Thoracic Tumors by Simulator

The Impact of Set-Up Errors on Dose Distribution During the Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Prostate Cancer

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

In Silico Studies of the Impact of Rotational Errors on Translation Shifts and Dose Distribution in Image-Guided Radiotherapy.

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

The impact of setup errors on dose distribution in cervical cancer radiotherapy and the margin from CTV to PTV

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

Setup errors and planning target margin by 6D radiotherapy couch combined with cone-beam CT during volumetric modulated arc therapy in gynecological cancer patients

Setup margins based on the inter‐ and intrafractional setup error of left‐sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath‐hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT)

Effects of error on dose of target region and organs at risk in treating nasopharynx cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy

Dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy and field-in-field treatment of left-sided breast cancer