Abstract:Reverse semi-decubitus (RSD) technique could reduce cardiac dose during breast radiotherapy for patients unable to tolerate breath hold. This study aimed to report the interfraction and intrafraction set-up variability for RSD technique and to determine an appropriate clinical tumor volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin to account for motion and positional uncertainties. Twenty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the protocol of RSD breast radiotherapy. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy in 15 fractions delivered by opposed tangential field or volumetric arc therapy with 7-mm PTV margin. The pre- and post-fraction cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired at fractions 1, 4, 7, 8, 11 and 14. CBCT data were matched to planning CT data using (i) chest wall and (ii) clips. Mean displacement (MD), systematic (Σ), and random (σ) translational errors in 3-dimensions (LR: left-right; AP: anterior-posterior; and CC: cranial-caudal) were analyzed. Positive values for LR, AP, and CC pointed at motion in right, anterior, cranial directions, respectively. Body weight and body mass index (BMI) were recorded to examine predictive factors for set-up variability. The CTV to PTV margins were calculated based on the van-Herk formula (2.5Σ + 0.7σ). A total of 300 CBCT scans were analyzed for 25 patients. The population MD, systematic, and random errors based on each of chest wall and clip matches were shown in the Table 1. The calculated interfraction and intrafraction CTV to PTV margins were 8.8/12.9/11.2 and 8.7/13.5/11.4 mm (LR/AP/CC) for the chest wall and clip matches, respectively. A correlation was observed between interfraction setup variability in the AP direction and body weight (R2 = 0.32; p = 0.004) and BMI (R2 = 0.61; p < 0.001). To calculate the AP margin for patients with heavier body weight and higher BMI, we divided the patients into two groups for each median value. The AP margins were 9.2 and 8.4 mm for patients with lighter body weight, and lower BMI, respectively. The AP margins were 11.6 and 10.9 mm for patients with heavier body weight and higher BMI, respectively. This is the first study to determine the PTV margins for interfraction and intrafraction set-up variability for reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy using pre- and post-fraction CBCT scans. A uniform 7-mm PTV margin is insufficient in the absence of CBCT. Table 1 Mean displacement (MD), systematic (Σ) and random (σ) translational errors, and calculated margins in 3-dimensions for chest wall and clip based cone-beam CT versus planning CT matches in reverse semi-decubitus positions (mm).Abstract 272; TableChest wall matchClip based matchInterfractionIntrafractionInterfractionIntrafractionLRMD0.3-0.20.7-0.2Σ1.90.91.80.9σ1.71.11.61.1Margin5.92.95.73.0APMD-2.3-0.5-1.6-0.6Σ3.30.93.61.0σ1.81.41.61.4Margin9.53.410.13.4CCMD0.80.30.40.3Σ2.51.02.60.9σ2.21.52.11.4Margin7.73.58.13.3 Open table in a new tab

Setup margins based on the inter‐ and intrafractional setup error of left‐sided breast cancer radiotherapy using deep inspiration breath‐hold technique (DIBH) and surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT)

The Benefits Evaluation Of Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Based On Knowledge-Based Radiotherapy Treatment Planning For Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Comparison of Setup Accuracy of Optical Surface Image Versus Orthogonal X-Ray Images for VMAT of the Left Breast Using Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold.

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Comparison of the Performance of Two Methods to Determine Set-Up Errors for DIBH Patients with Left Sided Breast Cancer in Radiotherapy

Skin marker combined with surface‐guided auto‐positioning for breast DIBH radiotherapy daily initial patient setup: An optimal schedule for both accuracy and efficiency

Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole‐breast cancer radiotherapy

Impact of Positioning Errors on the Dosimetry of Breath-Hold-Based Volumetric Arc Modulated and Tangential Field-in-Field Left-Sided Breast Treatments

Dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy and field-in-field treatment of left-sided breast cancer

Evaluating intra‐fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath‐hold

Assessment of Setup Accuracy Using Anatomical Landmarks for Breast and Chest Wall Irradiation With Surface Guided Radiation Therapy

Inter- and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of fiducial markers in patients with liver tumors receiving free-breathing postoperative radiation analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography.

Image-Guided Study of Interfraction and Intrafraction Set-up Variability and Margins in Reverse Semi-Decubitus Breast Radiation Therapy

Evaluation of Hybrid VMAT Advantages and Robustness Considering Setup Errors Using Surface Guided Dose Accumulation for Internal Lymph Mammary Nodes Irradiation of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy

Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?

Setup errors and planning target margin by 6D radiotherapy couch combined with cone-beam CT during volumetric modulated arc therapy in gynecological cancer patients

Impact of deep inspiration breath hold, surface-guided radiotherapy, and daily CBCT on the organs at risk in breast cancer radiotherapy

Incorporating Breath Holding and Image Guidance in the Adjuvant Gastric Cancer Radiotherapy: a Dosimetric Study

Impact of treatment set-up errors on accuracy of post-operation radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Optical Surface Management System and BladderScan for Patient Setup During Radiotherapy of Postoperative Prostate Cancer

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Residual Setup Errors and Intra-Fraction Motion Using the Stereotactic X-Ray Image Guidance Verification System