Verification of a general SPECT performance detection system on system performance part of SPECT

姚树林,耿建华,陈英茂,徐白萱,刘亚强,马天予
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2017.06.011
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To test the reliabilities of general software and phantom suite of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) quality control and the general testing system of SPECT quality control.Methods: The main system performances of 3 SPECT equipments from 2 manufacturers were tested by using general testing system of SPECT quality control and general QC software and phantom suite(self-test). And then to compare these results with those results of special software and phantom suite from manufacturers(manufacturer-test). Results: (1)System planar sensitivity: There was a very good consistence between the self-test and the manufacturer-test for the three SPECT equipments, and the relative deviations between the self-test and the manufacturer-test for all of them were below 0.2%. (2)System spatial resolution: There was a very good consistence between the self-test and the manufacturer-test for the three SPECT equipments, and the relative deviations of them also were below 0.2%. (3)Tomography spatial resolution: There was a very good consistence between the self-test and the manufacturer-test for the three SPECT equipments, and the relative deviations of them were below 5%. (4)Spatial resolution for whole body: There was a very good consistence between the self-test and the manufacturer-test for the three SPECT equipments, and the relative deviations of them were below 0.2%.Conclusion:The general software and phantom suite of SPECT quality control and the general testing system of SPECT quality control are reliable and the testing results are accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?