Abstract:Purpose Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on the integrated Elekta Unity magnetic resonance (MR)‐linac requires routine quality assurance to verify delivery accuracy and system data transfer. In this work, our objective was to develop and validate a novel automated end‐to‐end test suite that verifies data transfer between multiple software platforms and quantifies the performance of multiple machine subcomponents critical to the ART process. Methods We designed and implemented a software tool to quantify the MR and megavoltage (MV) isocenter coincidence, treatment couch positioning consistency, isocenter shift accuracy for the adapted plan as well as the MLC and jaw position accuracy following the beam aperture adaptation. Our tool employs a reference treatment plan with a simulated isocenter shift generated on an MR image of a readily available phantom with MR and MV visible fiducials. Execution of the test occurs within the standard adapt‐to‐position (ATP) clinical workflow with MV images collected of the delivered treatment fields. Using descriptive statistics, we quantified uncertainty in couch positioning, isocentre shift as well as the jaw and MLC positions of the adapted fields. We also executed sensitivity measurements to evaluate the detection algorithm's performance. Results We report the results of 301 daily testing instances. We demonstrated consistent tracking of the MR‐to‐MV alignment with respect to the established value and to detect small changes on the order of 0.2 mm following machine service events. We found couch position consistency relative to the test baseline value was within 95% CI [–0.31, 0.26 mm]. For phantom shifts that form the basis for the plan adaptation, we found agreement between MV‐image‐detected phantom shift and online image registration, within ± 1.5 mm in all directions with a 95% CI difference of [–1.29, 0.79 mm]. For beam aperture adaptation accuracy, we found differences between the planned and detected jaw positions had a mean value of 0.27 mm and 95% CI of [–0.29, 0.82 mm] and –0.17 mm and 95% CI of [–0.37, 0.05 mm] for the MLC positions. Automated fiducial detected accuracy was within 0.08 ± 0.20 mm of manual localization. Introduced jaw and MLC position errors (1–10 mm) were detected within 0.55 mm (within 1 mm for 15/256 instances for the jaws). Phantom shifts (1.3 or 5 mm in each cardinal direction) from a reference position were detected within 0.26 mm. Conclusions We have demonstrated the accuracy and sensitivity of a daily end‐to‐end test suite capable of detecting errors in multiple machine subcomponents including system data transfer. Our test suite evaluates the entire treatment workflow and has captured system communication issues prior to patient treatment. With automated processing and the use of a standard vendor‐provided phantom, it is possible to expand to other Unity sites.

SU-FF-T-174: A New Device for the Verification of Temporal Function of the 4DCT and Gating Delivery System

Quality assurance device for four-dimensional IMRT or SBRT and respiratory gating using patient-specific intrafraction motion kernels

Registration of On-Board X-ray Images with 4DCT: A Proposed Method of Phase and Setup Verification for Gated Radiotherapy

SU-E-T-154: Online Dose Verification with Gafchromic Film for Fixed-Gantry and Rotational Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Phantom Study.

SU-E-T-70: A Protocol for Comprehensive Acceptance/Commissioning of Complex 3D QA Devices

Technical evaluation of a laser-based optical surface scanning system for prospective and retrospective breathing adapted computed tomography

Efficient EPID-based Quality Assurance of Beam Time Delay for Respiratory-Gated Radiotherapy with Validation on Catalyst™ and AlignRT™ Systems.

Efficient EPID‐based quality assurance of beam time delay for respiratory‐gated radiotherapy with validation on CatalystTM and AlignRTTM systems

A Novel Technique For Vmat Qa With Epid In Cine Mode On A Varian Truebeam Linac

SU‐E‐T‐188: an Effective Quality Assurance Method for TomoTherapy Craniospinal Irradiation Patients with A 3D Semiconductor Phantom

An affordable custom phantom for measurement of linac time delay in gated treatments with irregular breathing

A Novel Technique For Vmat Qa With Epid In Cine Mode On Varian Truebeam

TU‐A‐BRA‐09: Phase‐Matched Digital Tomosynthesis (DTS) Imaging for Simultaneous Target Verification During Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Treatment

SU‐GG‐T‐529: Pre‐Clinical Evaluation of a 4D Tracking DmMLC‐Based Delivery to Lung Tumor

The performance of a new type accelerator uRT‐linac 506c evaluated by a quality assurance automation system

Data-driven rapid 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction for new generation linacs

Quality assurance of helical tomotherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy

TH‐C‐M100F‐05: APT4D, an Integrated Treatment Planning Platform for 4D Radiotherapy

Simultaneous Motion Monitoring and Truth-In-Delivery Analysis Imaging Framework for MR-guided Radiotherapy

MR‐linac daily semi‐automated end‐to‐end quality control verification

SU‐E‐T‐158: an End‐To‐End Quality Assurance Procedure for Advanced Radiation Therapy