Abstract:Purpose This paper's aim is to study a neglected research outcome within the last ten years, i.e. the impact of unemployment on the willingness of those laid off (victims) to endorse their previous employer to others. Design/methodology/approach A unique sample of unemployed victims completed an on‐line survey investigating the impact of personal background variables, organizational background variables and layoff treatment variables on their willingness to endorse their previous employer. Findings As expected, the perceived legitimacy of closure/procedural justice explained willingness to endorse. It was also found that higher perceived distributive justice was related to willingness to endorse. Collectively both layoff treatment variables explained most of the endorsement variance. Length of unemployment was positively related to anger and depression, and anger and depression were each negatively related to previous employer endorsement. In addition , it was also found that an unexpected new outcome, potential rehire, emerged as related to but distinct from willingness to endorse. Supporting this distinctiveness, victims who were angrier about being unemployed were less likely to endorse their previous employer to others, but victims who were more depressed about being unemployed were willing to potentially reapply to their former employer. Practical implications Study results reinforce the importance of perceived justice affecting not only layoff victims' previous employer endorsement but also their potential rehiring. Originality/value A uniquely unemployed sample, primarily executives, middle managers and professional, salaried individuals, with most being longer‐term unemployed, was utilized. There was also a stronger measure of distributive justice. Potential rehire emerged as a distinct outcome from willingness to endorse previous employer.

Politics , the Judiciary , and the Arbitration of Unfair Dismissal Disputes

Judicial Career Incentives and Court Performance: An Empirical Study of the German Labour Courts of Appeal

Judicial Favoritism of Politicians: Evidence from Small Claims Court

Judges’ interpretation of laws and labor rights protection: a study of labor contract-related court decisions in China

Judicial Independence and Corporate Employment: Evidence from China

The Selection of Litigation against Government Agencies: Evidence from China

Evidence-Guided Reform: Surveying the Empirical Research on Arbitrator Bias and Diversity in Investor–State Arbitration

When Employees Go to Court: Audit Office Labor Market Reputation and Audit Quality

Interventions In Hong Kong Courts: A Case-Based Study

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

Linking Organizational Justice and Psychological Conditions to Chinese Judges' Turnover Intention

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

Professional Values and Mental Health Tribunals: How Healthcare Professionals' and Lawyers' Views Are Shaped by Values, and How This Might Impede Reform

THE RATIONALE BEHIND CHOOSING ARBITRATION OVER LITIGATION: A LAW & ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE

Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges Can Be Impartial

Employment relations and dismissal regulations: Does employment legislation protect the health of workers?

Effects of layoff victims' justice reactions and emotional responses on attitudes toward their previous employer

What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach

A theoretical assessment of dismissal rates and unit performance, with empirical evidence.

Information and Bargaining through Agents: Experimental Evidence from Mexico’s Labour Courts

The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: masculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals