Reliability, Validity and Cut-off Score of the Chinese Version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-Report Form in Patients with Panic Disorder

Xitong Liu,Tingting Xu,Dandan Chen,Chen Yang,Pei Wang,Xiao Huang,Wenhong Cheng,Yuan Shen,Qiang Liu,Zhen Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02560-w
2020-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Panic disorder (PD) is often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or untreated in non-psychiatric clinical settings. Therefore, a cost-effective, accurate and easy-to-administer instrument for PD assessment is still needed. For that reason, the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR) has been developed and suggested to be a reliable and useful tool in clinical and research settings. The current study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PDSS-SR and determine the cut-off score of the PDSS-SR.METHODS:A total of 133 patients with PD in Shanghai were assessed by the PDSS-SR, PDSS and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). Moreover, 117 patients with non-PD anxiety and 51 healthy subjects also completed the PDSS-SR to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the scores of PD patients.RESULTS:The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) of the PDSS-SR was 0.72-0.80, and the interrater correlation coefficient was 0.78. The results of principal component analysis and varimax rotation indicated that the PDSS-SR had a two-factor structure, with all seven items having salient loadings. The cut-off score was 4, which was associated with high sensitivity (96.03%) and specificity (61.31%).CONCLUSIONS:The findings demonstrate that these items and the total score of the PDSS-SR have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with PD and that the PDSS-SR can be used by general doctors for clinical screening in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?