Validity and Reliability Testing of the Chinese (mainland) Version of the 39-Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

Wei Luo,Xiao-hong Gui,Bo Wang,Wen-ying Zhang,Zhi-yuan Ouyang,Yi Guo,Bao-rong Zhang,Mei-ping Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b0900380
2010-01-01
Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
Abstract:The 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) has been tested in many languages, but not in Chinese mainland. We aimed to assess the Chinese (mainland) version of the PDQ-39. Seventy-one subjects with Parkinson’s disease (PD) completed the PDQ-39 and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). All subjects were retested with the PDQ-39 a week later. The united Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr (H & Y) scale were also used to evaluate the subjects. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach’s α and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity was examined in terms of agreement with SF-36, UPDRS, and H & Y scales. The Chinese (mainland) version of the PDQ-39 demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α : 0.84–0.88; ICC: 0.56–0.82). The item-total correlations (0.33–0.88) and scaling success rates (77.56%) indicated satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity of the PDQ-39 items. The correlations between related constructs of the PDQ-39 and UPDRS ( r =0.44–0.68) and between those of the PDQ-39 and SF-36 ( r =(−0.46)-(−0.69)) were all statistically significant ( P <0.01). Except for stigma, cognitions, and bodily discomfort, all other dimensions of the PDQ-39 significantly discriminated patients at different H & Y stages indicated by the H & Y scale. Although our observations indicate that some problematic subscales of this version of the PDQ-39 could be improved upon, this study suggests acceptable reliability and validity of the Chinese (mainland) version of the PDQ-39.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?