Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Panic Disorder Severity Scale and Panic-Associated Symptom Scale

何燕玲,曾庆枝,魏镜,施慎逊,张海音,吴文源,陆峥,赵靖平,潘集阳

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7884.2013.04.006

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To exam the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) and its self-report version (PDSS-SR),and the Panic-Associated Symptom Scale (PASS).Methods The adult patients with moderate or severe panic disorder were collected from 13 centers in China.The PDSS,PDSS-SR and PASS were administered together with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA),Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17),Clinical Global Impression Severity Index (CGI-S),State-Trait Anxiety Invetory (STAI) and Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) at baseline and 3-5 days,4 weeks,6 weeks from baseline.Results A total of 126 patients recruited in the study had a PDSS mean score of (16.48 ±4.02) at baseline.Measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's α =0.74) and reliability (test-retest ICC =0.70-0.89) were acceptable.The PDSS score correlated with HAMA total scores and CGI score (r =0.35 and 0.46,respectively,P ＜0.01).Factor analysis yielded a 2-factor solution accounting for 57.3％ of the variance,one containing the panic and functional impariment (items 1-3 and 6-7) and the second containing avoidence (items 4 and 5).PDSS-SR has a mean score of (15.63 ± 4.45) at baseline with the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.78 with PDSS score.PASS had a baseline mean score of (14.17 ± 4.19) and also acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α =0.72) and reliability (test-retest ICC =0.64-0.77).Its Pearson correlation coefficients with PDSS score and PDSS-SR score were 0.68 and 0.60 respectively.Conclusions The PDSS,PDSS-SR and PASS have moderate to good reliability and validity.They are good for monitoring the clinical severity of patients with panic disorder.