Abstract:Carbon emission reduction has become a common hot topic around the world. Although the previous literature has proven that the asymmetric information and fairness concerns would influence the operational strategy for low-carbon supply chain, it hardly touched the asymmetric information of fairness concerns, which contradicted practical observations and experimental evidence. Incorporating the asymmetric information of fairness concerns, this paper investigates a low-carbon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer with discrete types including selfish S-type and fairness-concerned F-type. The manufacturer can observe and thereby know the behavioral type of the retailer in the scenario of symmetric information, while it cannot in the scenario of asymmetric information. In the approach of game theory, the optimal carbon emission reducing strategy and pricing strategy in the symmetric scenario and asymmetric scenario are achieved successively. By comparing the above two scenarios, the impacts stemming from the asymmetric information of fairness concerns at the individual level and systematic level are analyzed, respectively. A case study is offered before concluding some implications for the supply chain management. The findings include the following: Firstly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns enhances the carbon emission reduction significantly. Although the fairness concerns alone decrease the carbon emission reduction, the asymmetric information increases with the dominating power. Secondly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns raises the wholesale price and retail price dramatically. Although the impact of either fairness concerns or asymmetric information randomly changes with the behavioral type and information structure, their interactive impacts are stable and change smoothly. Thirdly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns promotes a fairer profit distribution, while either fairness concerns or asymmetric information alone hardly changes the overall profit of the low-carbon supply chain.

Supply Chain Decisions under Asymmetric Information with Cost and Fairness Concern

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Operational Strategy for Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information of Fairness Concerns

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

The Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-Concern Information.

Study of the Impact of Fairness Concern on Low Carbon Dual Channel Supply Chain

Supply Chain Contracting with Asymmetric Cost Information and Behavioral Preferences: Theory and Experiment

Uncertain Supply Chain Problem with Price and Effort

Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Retailer's Fairness Concerns

Logistics service decision for e-commerce supply chain with fairness concern under uncertain environment

A Novel Cooperative Game-Based Method to Coordinate a Sustainable Supply Chain under Psychological Uncertainty in Fairness Concerns

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain

Supply Chain Contracting With Competing Suppliers Under Asymmetric Information

Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

Optimal Decision-Making for Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerned Newsvendor in Two-Level Supply Chain

Newsvendor Model for a Dyadic Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Dual‐channel supply chain coordination under risk aversion and fairness concerns