Abstract:Carbon emission reduction has become a common hot topic around the world. Although the previous literature has proven that the asymmetric information and fairness concerns would influence the operational strategy for low-carbon supply chain, it hardly touched the asymmetric information of fairness concerns, which contradicted practical observations and experimental evidence. Incorporating the asymmetric information of fairness concerns, this paper investigates a low-carbon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer with discrete types including selfish S-type and fairness-concerned F-type. The manufacturer can observe and thereby know the behavioral type of the retailer in the scenario of symmetric information, while it cannot in the scenario of asymmetric information. In the approach of game theory, the optimal carbon emission reducing strategy and pricing strategy in the symmetric scenario and asymmetric scenario are achieved successively. By comparing the above two scenarios, the impacts stemming from the asymmetric information of fairness concerns at the individual level and systematic level are analyzed, respectively. A case study is offered before concluding some implications for the supply chain management. The findings include the following: Firstly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns enhances the carbon emission reduction significantly. Although the fairness concerns alone decrease the carbon emission reduction, the asymmetric information increases with the dominating power. Secondly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns raises the wholesale price and retail price dramatically. Although the impact of either fairness concerns or asymmetric information randomly changes with the behavioral type and information structure, their interactive impacts are stable and change smoothly. Thirdly, the asymmetric information of fairness concerns promotes a fairer profit distribution, while either fairness concerns or asymmetric information alone hardly changes the overall profit of the low-carbon supply chain.

The Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-Concern Information.

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Operational Strategy for Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information of Fairness Concerns

Price Signaling and Channel Coordination

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

Supply Chain Information Sharing Mechanism under the Condition of Asymmetric Demand Information

A game theoretic strategic model for understanding the online-offline competition and fairness concern under community group buying

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain

A study on supply chain information sharing strategy for emission reduction investment in electronic products based on game theory

The Fairness when the Retailers Compete

The Complexity Analysis in Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Fairness Concern and Different Business Objectives

Signaling Game about Quality and Safety of Perishable Product Supply Chain

Bargaining in mobile app supply chain considering members' fairness concern attitudes

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Fair Price Discrimination

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies

Impacts of distributional fairness concerns on quality disclosure in a dyadic supply chain

A dual-channel secondary closed-loop supply chain considering retail groups and fairness concerns

Fairness’ s Influences to the Retailer’s Ordering Decision