Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Bargaining in mobile app supply chain considering members' fairness concern attitudes

Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Platform: Price, Wage, and Payout Ratio

The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain

Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain

Pricing Games of Mixed Conventional and E-Commerce Distribution Channels

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

Strategic promotion decisions of competing mobile application suppliers in Stackelberg game context

Joint Investment and Pricing Decisions in a Mobile Game Supply Chain Considering Risk Attitudes

A pricing/ordering model for a dyadic supply chain with buyback guarantee financing and fairness concerns

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer

A game theoretic strategic model for understanding the online-offline competition and fairness concern under community group buying

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Double-Sided Bidding Mechanism for Resource Sharing in Mobile Cloud

Dynamic pricing strategy for content products considering consumer fairness concerns and strategic behavior

Impacts of Distributive Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Small Firms

The Complexity Analysis in Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Fairness Concern and Different Business Objectives

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

The Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-Concern Information.