Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Price Signaling and Channel Coordination

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

Coordinating retailers with price and service competition

The Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-Concern Information.

Information Sharing in a Channel with Partially Informed Retailers

Quality Signaling under External Information

Listing Prices As Signals of Quality in Markets with Negotiation

Price Signal or Blockchain Technology? Quality Information Disclosure in Dual-Channel Supply Chains

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Price decisions with asymmetric reference effect and information sharing in dual-channel supply chains

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Demand Information when Retailers Compete

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Pricing strategy and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain based on reference quality effect

A strategic analysis of timing of wholesale pricing and information sharing strategy in dual-channel retailing

Does better information lead to lower prices ? Price and Advertising Signaling under External Information about Product Quality

Dual‐Channel Distribution: The Case for Cost Information Asymmetry

Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Fair Price Discrimination

Pricing and Coordination in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain With Product Variety Under the Countervailing Power of the Retailer

Coordinating advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer channel