PP3 VALUATION OF SF-6DV2 HEALTH STATES USING TIME TRADE-OFF AND DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT WITH DURATION APPROACHES IN CHINA
J. Wu,S. Xie,X. He,G. Chen,J.E. Brazier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1215
IF: 5.156
2020-01-01
Value in Health
Abstract:To generate the value set of Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6Dv2) using both composite time trade-off (C-TTO) and discrete choice experiments with duration (DCETTO) approaches in China. A large representative sample of Chinese general population stratified by age, sex, education and proportion of urban/rural population, was recruited from eight provinces/municipalities in China. All respondents were asked to completed 8 C-TTO tasks and 10 DCETTO tasks during face-to-face interviews, with the order of C-TTO and DCETTO tasks randomized. OLS model, Random-effect model, Fixed-effect model and Tobit model were used for C-TTO data, and conditional logit model and mixed logit model were used for DCETTO. Acceptability assessed by self-reported difficulties on understanding/answering, monotonicity of logical ordering of model coefficients, and consistency between predicted values and observed C-TTO values using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute difference (MAD) and mean squared difference (MSD) were evaluated and compared between two approaches. A total of 3320 respondents (50.3 % males; range from 18-90 years) were recruited. For C-TTO, the predicted health state values ranged from -0.240 to 1 using random-effect model, with 931 (4.97%) out of all 18,750 states considered as worse than dead (WTD). The corresponding range was -0.535 to 1 using conditional logit model for DCETTO, with a higher WTD percentage (8.50%, N=1,593). No significant difference was observed in self-reported difficulties on understanding/answering between two approaches. DCETTO presented minor nonmonotonicity with the coefficients in two dimension-levels (the first- and second-level in Mental-health and Vitality), which was not observed for C-TTO. Both approaches values are highly consistent (ICC=0.981, MAD=0.0808, MSD=0.0094) while DCETTO values were slightly lower than C-TTO. Both C-TTO and DCETTO approaches present relatively good acceptability, monotonicity and consistency for eliciting utility values in China. Minor issues of nonmonotonicity did present for DCETTO. A systematic difference was found between value sets between C-TTO and DCETTO.