Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-reporting questionnaire for the screening of mental disorder among community population

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

Chinese Version of the EQ-5D Preference Weights: Applicability in a Chinese General Population

Population Norms for SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in China.

Do Rural Residents in China Understand EQ-5D-5L As Intended? Evidence from a Qualitative Study.

A head-to-head comparison of EQ health and wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and EQ-5D-5L in patients, carers, and general public in China

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese Population Health Survey

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3 L and the EQ-5D-5 L in an elderly Chinese population

EQ-5D-5L Population Scores in Mainland China: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey 2021

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Sub-Health: Evidence Based on Primary Health Care Workers in China

Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L in China derived from the 2013 National Health Services Survey

Measuring health-related quality of life in elementary and secondary school students using the Chinese version of the EQ-5D-Y in rural China

Comparative Performance and Mapping Algorithms Between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese General Population

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among Overweight and Obesity Populations in China.

Study on reliability and validity of Chinese version of EQ-5D-5L

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

EQ-5D-5L Population Norms for China Derived from a National Health Survey

An evaluation of EQ-5D-3L health utility scores using five country-specific tariffs in a rural population aged 45–69 years in Hua county, Henan province, China