Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese Population Health Survey

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among Overweight and Obesity Populations in China.

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Comparison Between Eq-5d and Sf-6d Utility in Rural Residents of Jiangsu Province, China

Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D and SF-6D in East and South-East Asian populations: a scoping review

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Psychometric Performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6DV2 in Measuring Health Status of Populations in Chinese University Staff and Students.

Comparative Performance and Mapping Algorithms Between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese General Population

Population Norms for SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in China.

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

PCN286 COMPARING EQ-5D-3L AND EQ-5D-5L PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF COMMON CANCERS IN CHINA: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Sub-Health: Evidence Based on Primary Health Care Workers in China

Chinese Version of the EQ-5D Preference Weights: Applicability in a Chinese General Population

Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D-3 L and the EQ-5D-5 L in an elderly Chinese population

A Head-to-head Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L Index Scores Derived from the Two EQ-5D-3L Value Sets for China

A head-to-head comparison of EQ health and wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and EQ-5D-5L in patients, carers, and general public in China

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in COVID-19 Patients in China

How the EQ-5D Utilities Are Derived Matters in Chinese Diabetes Patients: a Comparison Based on Different EQ-5D Scoring Functions for China.

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China

Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Measuring the HRQoL Burden of 4 Health Conditions in China