Abstract:Background: This study evaluates the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of persons with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by using EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 and compares the measurement properties of the two instruments. Method: DLBCL patients were identified via a patient group and were surveyed using web-based questionnaires. Demographic information, socioeconomic status (SES), clinical characteristics, and EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 responses were collected and statistically described. The association between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions were analyzed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient, whereas the correlation of the utility scores was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The agreement between the responses of the two instruments were examined using a Bland-Altman (B-A) plot. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare the utility scores across subgroups in different clinical states (a t-test was used if there were two subgroups). In addition, the graded response model (GRM) was used to describe the discrimination ability and difficulty characteristics of the dimensions in the two instruments. Results: In total, 582 valid responses were collected, among which 477 respondents were associated with initial-treatment and 105 respondents were relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores of the DLBCL patients were 0.828 (0.222) and 0.641 (0.220), respectively. The correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions ranged from 0.299 to 0.680, and the correlation between their utility scores was 0.787. The B-A plot demonstrated an acceptable but not strong agreement between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utility scores. The GRM model results indicated that all dimensions of each instrument were highly discriminating overall, but EQ-5D-5L had suboptimal discriminative power among patients with good health. Conclusion: Both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 showed valid properties to assess the HRQoL of DLBCL patients. However, utility scores derived from the two instruments had substantial difference, thereby prohibiting the interchangeable use of utilities from the two instruments.

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in COVID-19 Patients in China

Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D and SF-6D in East and South-East Asian populations: a scoping review

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Psychometric validation of the Chinese versions of EQ-5D-Y-3L and the experimental EQ-TIPS in children and adolescents with COVID-19

A US Population Health Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 Using the EQ-5D-5L

EQ-5D-5L Population Scores in Mainland China: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey 2021

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in patients with lymphoma in China

How the EQ-5D Utilities Are Derived Matters in Chinese Diabetes Patients: a Comparison Based on Different EQ-5D Scoring Functions for China.

Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L performance in common cancers: suggestions for instrument choosing

A Head-to-head Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L Index Scores Derived from the Two EQ-5D-3L Value Sets for China

Impact of COVID-19 on health-related quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease: a multi-ethnic Asian study

Changing Trends of Mental and Behavioral Responses and Associations During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: a Panel Study

Associations between depressive symptoms and quality of life among residents of Wuhan, China during the later stage of the COVID-19 pandemic: A network analysis

Validation and Comparison of Euroqol-5 Dimension (Eq-5D) and Short Form-6 Dimension (Sf-6D) among Stable Angina Patients

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 health utilities scores of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China

A head-to-head comparison of EQ health and wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and EQ-5D-5L in patients, carers, and general public in China

Health-Related Quality of Life for People With Acute and Chronic Illnesses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Impact of Influenza on the Health Related Quality of Life in China: an EQ-5D Survey

Impact of Long COVID on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients After Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study

An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study with a Focus on Fatigue, Memory/Concentration Problems and Dyspnea Dimensions