Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Validation and Comparison of Euroqol-5 Dimension (Eq-5D) and Short Form-6 Dimension (Sf-6D) among Stable Angina Patients

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development And Validation Of A Questionnaire To Assess The Quality Of Life In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease In Mainland China

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D and SF-6D in East and South-East Asian populations: a scoping review

Chronic Stable Angina is Associated with Lower Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence from Chinese Patients

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L performance in common cancers: suggestions for instrument choosing

A head-to-head comparison of EQ health and wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and EQ-5D-5L in patients, carers, and general public in China

Comparison of EuroQol-5D-3L and Short Form-6D Utility Scores in Family Caregivers of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SF36 v2 in aging patients with chronic heart failure

Comparison of the measurement properties between a short and generic instrument, the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, and a longer and disease-specific instrument, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast (FACT-B), in Asian breast cancer patients

Assessing the diversity and determinants of health‐related quality of life measures in patients with acute heart failure

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Psychometric Comparison of EQ-5D-Y, CHU-9D, and PedsQL 4.0 in Chinese Children and Adolescents With Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter Study

Health-related quality of life in primary care patients: a comparison between EQ-5D-5L utility score and EQ-visual analogue scale

Psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in patients with lymphoma in China

Validation of the Generic Version of China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME‐G) among individuals with type 2 diabetes in China

VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE