Abstract:Objective: to assess the feasibility of a new stated preference approach, the multiple bounded dichotomous choice (MBDC), designed to generate value sets for preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life. Methods: MBDC and standard gamble (SG) tasks were completed to derive SF-6Dv2 value sets from a sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada. Participants were randomized between the two approaches: 6 health states were evaluated in SG and 11 health states in MBDC. Several models were used to estimate data in each approach, and the preferred models were chosen by using mean absolute error (MAE), logical consistency of parameters, and significance levels. Results of MBDC were compared with SG in terms of acceptability (self-reported difficulty and quality levels in answering, and completion time), consistency (monotonicity of model coefficients), accuracy (standard errors), dimensions coefficient magnitude, correlation between the value sets estimated, and the range of estimated values. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess value sets' consistency. Results: Out of 655 individuals who completed MBDC tasks and 828 who completed SG tasks, a total of 585 participants for MBDC and 714 for SG tasks were included for analysis. The preferred models for both approaches were GLS Tobit. No significant difference was observed in self-reported difficulties and qualities in answers among approaches, but MBDC had less excluded participants and was less prone to report difficulties in answering. Additionally, completion time in the MBDC group was significantly lower (99.80 vs 68.12 s). Most standard errors in the MBDC were lower than those in SG, and the number of non-significant parameters was also lower. The range of utility values generated by MBDC tended to be wider (-0.372 to 1) than those generated by the SG (-0.137 to 1) and the number of worse-than-dead states in MBDC (0.91%) was higher than for SG (0.08%). The Pain dimension was identified as the most significant, while the Vitality dimension showed the lowest significant decrement. Both approaches exhibited a tendency to overestimate severe health state values and underestimate better health state values. The correlation and ICC between the two value sets were 0.937 and 0.983, respectively. Conclusion: Based on empirical evidence, it can be inferred that the MBDC method is not only feasible but also holds the potential to generate meaningful and well-informed preference data from respondents. This approach can be used to derive a value set for preference-based instrument.

Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension

Valuation of EQ-5D-3L Health States in Singapore: Modeling of Time Trade-Off Values for 80 Empirically Observed Health States

Comparison of four approaches in eliciting health state utilities with SF-6Dv2

Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: an Exploratory Study.

Rural population’s preferences matter: a value set for the EQ-5D-3L health states for China’s rural population

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: a Comparison of Seven Asian Populations.

Peruvian Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L: A Direct Comparison of Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

A novel approach for health state valuation: Multiple bounded dichotomous choice compared to the traditional standard gamble

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States: A Comparison of Three Asian Countries

Quantifying stakeholders' preference for implantable medical devices in China: a discrete choice experiment

Treatment Preferences of Residents Assumed to Have Severe Chronic Diseases in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

Mapping the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) to SF-6Dv2 in Chinese patients with heart failure

Preference for Community Health Services in People with Chronic Diseases: a Discrete Choice Experiment in China

Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D and SF-6D in East and South-East Asian populations: a scoping review

Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial of the Electronic Version of the Chinese SF-36.

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Child health valuation protocol for a discrete choice experiment comparing paired comparison and kaizen tasks and estimating US EQ-5D-Y-3L values on an experience scale

The Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D): Development and Evolution