Abstract:Objective: to assess the feasibility of a new stated preference approach, the multiple bounded dichotomous choice (MBDC), designed to generate value sets for preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life. Methods: MBDC and standard gamble (SG) tasks were completed to derive SF-6Dv2 value sets from a sample of the general population in Quebec, Canada. Participants were randomized between the two approaches: 6 health states were evaluated in SG and 11 health states in MBDC. Several models were used to estimate data in each approach, and the preferred models were chosen by using mean absolute error (MAE), logical consistency of parameters, and significance levels. Results of MBDC were compared with SG in terms of acceptability (self-reported difficulty and quality levels in answering, and completion time), consistency (monotonicity of model coefficients), accuracy (standard errors), dimensions coefficient magnitude, correlation between the value sets estimated, and the range of estimated values. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed to assess value sets' consistency. Results: Out of 655 individuals who completed MBDC tasks and 828 who completed SG tasks, a total of 585 participants for MBDC and 714 for SG tasks were included for analysis. The preferred models for both approaches were GLS Tobit. No significant difference was observed in self-reported difficulties and qualities in answers among approaches, but MBDC had less excluded participants and was less prone to report difficulties in answering. Additionally, completion time in the MBDC group was significantly lower (99.80 vs 68.12 s). Most standard errors in the MBDC were lower than those in SG, and the number of non-significant parameters was also lower. The range of utility values generated by MBDC tended to be wider (-0.372 to 1) than those generated by the SG (-0.137 to 1) and the number of worse-than-dead states in MBDC (0.91%) was higher than for SG (0.08%). The Pain dimension was identified as the most significant, while the Vitality dimension showed the lowest significant decrement. Both approaches exhibited a tendency to overestimate severe health state values and underestimate better health state values. The correlation and ICC between the two value sets were 0.937 and 0.983, respectively. Conclusion: Based on empirical evidence, it can be inferred that the MBDC method is not only feasible but also holds the potential to generate meaningful and well-informed preference data from respondents. This approach can be used to derive a value set for preference-based instrument.

PNS240 A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ANCHORING DCE-DERIVED LATENT UTILITIES ONTO THE QALY SCALE: EVIDENCE FROM SF-6D V2

Whose Time Trade-Off Should Be Used? Anchoring Discrete Choice Experiment Latent Utilities in Health State Valuation.

PNS246 EXPLORING THE PERFORMANCE OF USING DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS FOR ELICITING HEALTH STATE UTILITIES IN CHINA: EVIDENCE FROM SF-6D V2

Do Discrete Choice Experiments Approaches Perform Better Than Time Trade-Off in Eliciting Health State Utilities? Evidence from SF-6Dv2 in China.

PP3 VALUATION OF SF-6DV2 HEALTH STATES USING TIME TRADE-OFF AND DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT WITH DURATION APPROACHES IN CHINA

Eliciting SF-6Dv2 health state utilities using an anchored best-worst scaling technique.

Discrete choice experiment with duration versus time trade-off: a comparison of test–retest reliability of health utility elicitation approaches in SF-6Dv2 valuation

A novel approach for health state valuation: Multiple bounded dichotomous choice compared to the traditional standard gamble

How the EQ-5D Utilities Are Derived Matters in Chinese Diabetes Patients: a Comparison Based on Different EQ-5D Scoring Functions for China.

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Comparison of four approaches in eliciting health state utilities with SF-6Dv2

Comparison of the Measurement Properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese Population Health Survey

A Comparison of Health State Utilities among Breast Cancer Patients in Mainland China

Comparison Between Eq-5d and Sf-6d Utility in Rural Residents of Jiangsu Province, China

Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension

Similar responses to EQ-5D-3L by two elicitation methods: visual analogue scale and time trade-off

A new SF-6Dv2 value set based on a Hybrid model using SG, cTTO, and DCE data

Development of Conversion Functions Mapping the FACT-B Total Score to the EQ-5D-5L Utility Value by Three Linking Methods and Comparison with the Ordinary Least Square Method

Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China

Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

Comparative Performance and Mapping Algorithms Between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese General Population