Abstract:Two independent lateral-force calibration methods for the atomic force microscope (AFM)—the hammerhead (HH) technique and the diamagnetic lateral force calibrator (D-LFC)—are systematically compared and found to agree to within 5 % or less, but with precision limited to about 15 %, using four different tee-shaped HH reference probes. The limitations of each method, both of which offer independent yet feasible paths toward traceable accuracy, are discussed and investigated. We find that stiff cantilevers may produce inconsistent D-LFC values through the application of excessively high normal loads. In addition, D-LFC results vary when the method is implemented using different modes of AFM feedback control, constant height and constant force modes, where the latter is more consistent with the HH method and closer to typical experimental conditions. Specifically, for the D-LFC apparatus used here, calibration in constant height mode introduced errors up to 14 %. In constant force mode using a relatively stiff cantilever, we observed an ≈ 4 % systematic error per μN of applied load for loads ≤ 1 μN. The issue of excessive load typically emerges for cantilevers whose flexural spring constant is large compared with the normal spring constant of the D-LFC setup (such that relatively small cantilever flexural displacements produce relatively large loads). Overall, the HH method carries a larger uncertainty, which is dominated by uncertainty in measurement of the flexural spring constant of the HH cantilever as well as in the effective length dimension of the cantilever probe. The D-LFC method relies on fewer parameters and thus has fewer uncertainties associated with it. We thus show that it is the preferred method of the two, as long as care is taken to perform the calibration in constant force mode with low applied loads.

Simultaneously Measuring Force and Displacement: Calibration of Magnetic Torque Actuated Microcantilevers for Nanomechanical Mapping

A Nondestructive Calibration Method for Maximizing the Range and Accuracy of AFM Force Measurement

Enhanced Accuracy of Force Application for AFM Nanomanipulation Using Nonlinear Calibration of Optical Levers

Calibration of Lateral Force Measurements in Atomic Force Microscopy with a Piezoresistive Force Sensor

A 3D surface nanomechanical property mapping method with a magnetic-drive orthogonal cantilever probe

Calibration and Nonlinearity Compensation for Force Application in AFM Based Nanomanipulation

Calibration of the Effective Spring Constant of Ultra-Short Cantilevers for A High-Speed Atomic Force Microscope

Fractionized Calibration of the Sample Stage Used in an AFM-probe Mechanical Testing System

Development and Calibration of a Compact Self-Sensing Atomic Force Microscope Head for Micro-Nano Characterization

Force Calibration of A Dual-Probe Nanotweezer Using A Mechanical Lever

Quantification of surface displacements and electromechanical phenomena via dynamic atomic force microscopy

Lateral force calibration for atomic force microscope cantilevers using a suspended nanowire

Improved Calibration Method For Lateral Force Of The Cantilever Deflection Force Sensor In Atomic Force Microscope

Inner-paddled Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever for Rapid Mechanical Mapping

Broad modulus range nanomechanical mapping by magnetic-drive soft probes

A Novel Method and System for Calibrating the Spring Constant of Atomic Force Microscope Cantilever Based on Electromagnetic Actuation.

Quantitative Measurements of Electromechanical Response with a Metrological Atomic Force Microscope

The Development of 3D Atomic Force Microscopy with Magnetically Driven-Orthogonal Cantilever Probes

Metrological Atomic Force Microscope with Self-Sensing Measuring Head

Magnetic-Dielectric Cantilevers for Atomic Force Microscopy

Quantitative Comparison of Two Independent Lateral Force Calibration Techniques for the Atomic Force Microscope.