The growth behavior of austenite grain in the heating process of 300M steel
S.S. Zhang,M.Q. Li,Y.G. Liu,J. Luo,T.Q. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.089
2011-01-01
Abstract:The 300M steel was heated in an electric furnace at the temperatures of 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050 °C, and holding time of 5, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120 min. The grain size of austenite was measured by using the linear intercept method on Olympus PMG3 metallographic microscope. The experimental results show that grain size of austenite increases with the increasing of heating temperature and holding time, and the grain growth model of austenite in 300M steel is in the following: d = 4.04 × 10 6 t 0.17 exp( − (1.32 × 10 5 / RT )). Keywords 300M steel Heating temperature Holding time Austenite grain growth 1 Introduction The grain growth of austenite in heating process of steel has been focused by many researchers for many years. Sha and Sun [1] investigated the grain growth behavior of austenite in Nb–V–Ti microalloyed steel, and found that the grains of austenite grow up with the increasing of heating temperature; the Ti-rich carbonitrides assembling in the grain boundaries of austenite restrain the grain growth of austenite at the temperature below 1250 °C. Yu and Sun [2] pointed out that the critical growth temperature of austenite grains in 0.015% Nb steel is 1240 °C; the grains of austenite in 0.015% Nb steel are finer than that in Nb free steel in the range of 1150–1230 °C. The austenite grain size in 16MnNi 4 HSLA steel increases rapidly by heating at 1200 °C for 5–30 min or 1150 °C for 60 min, which was obtained by Fernández et al. [3] . Therefore, the major factors affecting the grain size of austenite are the heating temperature, holding time and alloying elements. The commercial ultrahigh-strength low alloying steel 300M (40CrNi 2 Si 2 MoV), has been modified by adding the alloying elements of silicon and vanadium in 4340 steel. Because of the high strength, good fracture toughness and fatigue behavior, 300M steel is widely used to manufacture the central spindle, wheel gear, aerofoil fastener and so on. It becomes one of the best steels for manufacturing the aircraft landing system. Much more investigation was carried out for the microstructure and mechanical properties of 300M steel [4–8] . As the coarse grains are generally observed in the manufacturing process of 300M steel forging, many researchers have paid attention to investigate the mechanism of low plasticity and ductility caused by the coarse grains. Zhang et al. [9] pointed out that the 300M steel being fabricated by vacuum induction melting and vacuum arc remelting has higher purity and stronger overheating sensitivity, in which the growth tendency of austenite grain increased and it would result in the occurrence of coarse grains as adopting unsuitable forging method. In terms of the experimental results, two heat treatment processes of 300M steel were suggested so as to eliminate the coarse grains as follows [10] : (1) high temperature normalizing in the temperature range of 970–980 °C, and (2) heated to 700 °C for 60 min and air-cooling, then heated to 930 °C rapidly with holding time of 60 min, and finally cooled in air. However, the growth behavior of austenite grain in the heating process of 300M steel was reported in a few literatures. In this article, the effect of the heating temperature and holding time on the morphology and grain size of austenite in as received 300M steel is investigated. Based on the experimental results, the growth model of austenite grain in 300M steel is presented. 2 Experimental procedures The chemical composition of as received 300M steel is shown in Table 1 , and the morphology of austenite grains is shown in Fig. 1 . The as received 300M steel bar is of 22.0 mm in diameter, its A c1 temperature and A c3 temperature are 748 °C and 802 °C, respectively. The dimensions of experimental specimens machined from as received 300M steel are 10.0 mm × 8.0 mm × 5.0 mm. The heating treatment was carried out in a type SX-5-12 electric furnace at the heating temperatures of 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050 °C and holding time of 5, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120 min. After heating treatment, the 300M steel specimens were quenched in water immediately. Those quenched specimens were prepared using standard metallographic techniques. The saturated aqueous picric acid solution with a few drops of detergent was used to reveal the prior austenite grain boundaries, and polished surfaces were etched in that aqueous solution for about 30 min at room temperature. The austenite grains choosing 8 visual fields in every specimen were observed on Olympus PMG3 microscope. The grain size of austenite was measured by using the linear intercept method through SISC IAS V8.0 image software [11] , counting more than 400 grains for each specimen so as to ensure the measurement accuracy, and choosing the mean chord length of austenite grain as a measure of austenite grain size. 3 Results and analysis 3.1 Effect of heating temperature on the morphology and grain size of austenite Fig. 2 shows the morphology of austenite grain in 300M steel at different heating temperatures and a holding time of 5 min. As seen from Fig. 2 , the fine austenite grains distribute inhomogeneously as new austenite grains contact with each other, the grain boundary is bend, and the undissolved particles (carbides) occur as shown in Fig. 2 a. Adding Cr, Mo and V as alloying elements in 300M steel, the carbides having high melting point and stability occur in 300M steel. Those carbide particles that separate toward grain boundaries affect the diffusion of iron and carbon atoms, and finally prevent the growth of austenite grain in the heating process of 300M steel [12,13] . The grain boundaries reduce and become flat with the increasing of heating temperature being close to an angle of 120°. Grain shapes have a slight change, in which some of the austenite grains grow up and the others shrink or disappear. As the carbides dissolved, the pinning effect of carbides reduces and the austenite grains grow up quickly, meanwhile the austenite grains coarsen as seen from Fig. 2 b and c. Fig. 3 indicates the distribution of austenite grain in 300M steel at different heating temperatures. As seen from Fig. 3 , the grain size distribution of austenite is close to lognormal distribution being consistent with the results presented by Han et al. [14] and Kurtz and Carpay [15] . At a temperature of 850 °C, the grain size of austenite is less than 20 μm and mostly in the range of 6–10 μm as shown in Fig. 3 a; at a temperature of 950 °C, the number of austenite grains with grain size above 20 μm increases, and that of austenite grains with grain size above 50 μm is few. The grain size of austenite shown in Fig. 3 b is mostly in the range of 20–35 μm. The number of austenite grains with the grain size above 50 μm increases with the increasing of heating temperature. At a temperature of 1050 °C, the percentage of austenite grains with grain size above 50 μm is 80.65%, and that of austenite grains with grain size above 100 μm is 15.65%. The grain size of austenite is mostly in the range of 50–80 μm. Quantitative analysis of austenite grain size in 300M steel at different heating temperatures is presented in Table 2 , effect of the heating temperature on the grain size of austenite is shown in Fig. 4 . As seen from Fig. 4 , the austenite grains grow up gradually as the heating temperature increases, this result is consistent with that of Maropoulos et al. [16] . The average grain size of austenite in 300M steel increases from 7.91 to 67.10 μm, and the austenite grain grade decreases from 11.0 to 5.0. The austenite grains in 300M steel at a heating temperature below 900 °C grow up slowly, and then the grain size of austenite increases rapidly at a temperature above 900 °C. Those results are in a good agreement with that in Ref. [17] . On one hand, the atomic activity increases with the increasing of heating temperature, and the self-diffusion of iron atoms induces the austenite transformation, the diffusion of carbon atoms migrates austenite crystal nucleus to α and Fe 3 C phase, and so the big austenite grain merges the small one; on the other hand, the grain size of austenite is small at a temperature of 900 °C because of the great number of carbides, then austenite grains grow up after those carbides dissolving into austenite. 3.2 Effect of the holding time on the morphology and grain size of austenite Fig. 5 shows the morphology of austenite grain in 300M steel at different holding time and a temperature of 900 °C. As seen from Fig. 5 , the fine austenite grains occur, the quantity of grain boundary increases and the grain boundary is bend. The carbides generated by the element Cr, Mo and V dissolve into austenite gradually as the holding time increases. When the holding time is shorter, the carbides cannot dissolve fully into austenite, which can be seen in Fig. 5 a. The grain boundaries reduce and become flat being close to an angle of 120° as shown from Fig. 5 b–d. The longer the holding time, the more stable the austenite grain is. Fig. 6 indicates the distribution of austenite grains in 300M steel at a temperature of 900 °C and different holding time. As seen from Fig. 6 , the distribution of austenite grain size is close to lognormal distribution. The austenite grain size shown in Fig. 6 a is mostly in the range of 6–10 μm at a holding time of 5 min. And most of the austenite grain size shown in Fig. 6 b is in the range of 12–18 μm at a holding time of 30 min. The grain size of austenite increases rapidly at the holding time above 90 min, and the grain size is mostly in the range of 20–40 μm. The percentage of austenite grains with size above 50 μm is 19.49% at a holding time of 120 min. The morphology of austenite grains at a heating temperature of 1050 °C is similar to that at a heating temperature of 900 °C. The carbides generated by Cr, Mo and V dissolve in austenite gradually as the holding time increases. The austenite grains grow up slowly and the morphology of austenite grains tends to stable hexagon structure. Quantitative analysis of austenite grain size in 300M steel at different holding time and temperature of 900 °C and 1050 °C is presented in Table 3 , effect of the holding time on the grain size of austenite is shown in Fig. 7 . As seen from Fig. 7 , the austenite grains grow up slowly at the holding time below 90 min, and the grain size of austenite increases rapidly after the time is more than 90 min. As seen from Figs. 2 and 7 , it is concluded that effect of the holding time on the growth of austenite grain is slighter than that of the heating temperature. It is because the grain growth rate will not increase with the increasing of holding time at a certain heating temperature after a sharp increase and finally stops to a certain size. 4 The growth model of austenite grain According to the metallographic principles, the grain size of austenite in 300M steel can be expressed as the following empirical equation: (1) d = K t n where d is the average grain size (μm), t is the holding time (s), K and n are the material constants depending on material and temperature, n is less than 0.5 for most of materials and it is 0.3 generally. The K value is depending on material and temperature, the relation between austenite grain growth and austenitizing condition has been explained by thermally activated atomic jump process, so Eq. (1) can be expressed by the following Arrhenius type equation [13] : (2) d = A t n exp − Q R T where d is the average grain size (μm), t is the holding time (s), Q is the activation energy for grain growth (J/mol), T is the absolute heating temperature (K), R is the gas constant (8.31 J mol −1 K −1 ), A and n are the material constants. To quantitatively express the growth model of austenite grain in 300M steel, which can be derived considering the effect of heating temperature and holding time, unknown variables were analyzed by multiple-regression and then following equation could be: (3) d = 4.04 × 10 6 t 0.17 exp − 1.32 × 10 5 R T where d is the average grain size (μm), t is the holding time (s), T is the absolute heating temperature (K), R is the gas constant (8.31 J mol −1 K −1 ). The accuracy of mathematical approximation during the process of multiply regression analysis is shown in Table 4 , and the comparison of the calculated by using Eq. (3) with the experimental grain size of austenite in 300M steel is shown in Fig. 8 . As seen from Fig. 8 , the average relative error between the calculated and the experimental grain size of austenite in 300M steel is 14.64%. The calculated grain size of austenite in 300M steel is in a good agreement with the experimental one. 5 Conclusions With the increasing of heating temperature and holding time, the grain size of austenite in 300M steel increases, while the grain boundaries of austenite reduce and become flat being close to an angle of 120°. The growth of austenite grain is affected by the heating temperature and holding time. The growth model of austenite grain in 300M steel is described as follows: d = 4.04 × 10 6 t 0.17 exp( − (1.32 × 10 5 / RT )). References [1] Q.Y. Sha Z.Q. Sun Mater. Sci. Eng. A 523 2009 77 84 [2] Q.B. Yu Y. Sun Mater. Sci. Eng. A 420 2006 34 38 [3] J. Fernández S. Illescas J.M. Guilemany Mater. Lett. 61 2007 2389 2392 [4] Y. Tomita T. Okawa Mater. Sci. Eng. A 172 1993 145 151 [5] S.A. Khan H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia Metall. Trans. A 21 1990 859 875 [6] Y. Tomita T. Okawa Mater. Sci. Technol. 11 1995 245 251 [7] Z.Y. Zhao B.W. Zhong J. Mater. Eng. 1992 139 145 (in Chinese) [8] C.P. Luo L.K. Xu J.Z. Zha Acta Metall. Sin. 29 1993 A312 A317 (in Chinese) [9] W. Zhang Z.Y. Zhao Y.S. Feng J. Mater. Eng. 1994 15 17 (in Chinese) [10] W. Zhang Z.Y. Zhao D.T. Zhang J. Mater. Eng. 1993 21 25 (in Chinese) [11] SISC IAS V8.0, Beijing, PR China, Scientific Instrument Software Co. Ltd., 2003. [12] R. Staśko H. Adrian A. Adrian Mater. Charact. 56 2006 340 347 [13] S.J. Lee Y.K. Lee Mater. Des. 29 2008 1840 1844 [14] L.Z. Han R.K. Chen J.F. Gu Acta Metall. Sin. 45 2009 1446 1450 (in Chinese) [15] S.K. Kurtz F.M.A. Carpay J. Appl. Phys. 51 1980 5725 5744 [16] S. Maropoulos S. Karagiannis N. Ridley J. Mater. Sci. 42 2007 1309 1320 [17] A.S. Kumar B.R. Kumar G.L. Datta Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 2010 954 960