Comparison of Immediate PTCA and Elective PTCA on Infarct Related Artery after Spontaneous Recanalization

彭建军,李田昌,胡大一,商丽华,贾三庆,庞文跃,杨明,王乐丰,陈方
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2003.03.010
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of immediate PTCA and elective PTCA on infarct related artery after spontaneous recanalization. Methods One hundred and eighteen patients with SR between January 1996 and March 2001 were enrolled. According to TIMI flow, the patients were divided into 2 study populations. The two study populations were divided into 2 groups according to immediate PTCA or elective PTCA, respectively. Results Mortality and reinfarction were similar between the 2 groups two weeks after heart attack. However, recurrent ischemic events were more frequent in elective PTCA group than in immediate PTCA group according to TIMI flow grade 2 (1/24 vs 4/12,P=0.034). Furthermore, heparin or low molecular weight heparin was prescribed more frequently in elective PTCA (4/24 vs 11/12, 3/45 vs 34/37,P0.001). Congestive heart failure of elective PTCA group with TIMI flow grade 2 tended to be more frequent than immediate PTCA group in the 6-month follow-up. Meanwhile, left ventricular ejections of elective PTCA group were significantly lower than those of immediate PTCA group [(61.4±6.3)% vs (43.8±5.4)%,P=0.03]. Conclusion The clinical outcomes of patients with SR who underwent immediate PTCA are better than those of patients who received elective PTCA, with less hospital cost and less patients′ discomfort.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?