Safety and short-term outcome of multivessel percutanous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction

Wang Shouli,Han Yaling,Jing Quanmin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2194.2006.14.011
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical safty and short-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)by drug eluting stenting early after acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 343 patients who had multivessel disease and underwent PCI within 10 days after AMI were enrollded from January 2003 to November 2005 and were divided into three groups(134 patients in single-PCI group,112 patients in re-PCI-BMS group and 97 patients in re-PCI-DES group).The clinical safty and short-term outcomes of all patients were evaluated.Results The average ages of both re-PCI-BMS and re-PCI-DES groups were older than that of single-PCI group(68.4±12.8 yrs vs 63.9±11.4 yrs,P<0.01;69.2±13.4 vs 63.9±11.4 yrs,P<0.01).There was a significantly higher frequency of heart failure(Killip's≥Ⅱdegree)in re-PCI-BMS group and re-PCI-DES group(10.4%vs 25.9%,P<0.01;10.4%vs 26.8%,P<0.01)as well as peripheral vascular disease.The ratios of triple vessel lesion in both re-PCI-BMS and re-PCI-DES groups were significantly higher than that in single-PCI group(54.5%vs 38.1%,P<0.05;56.7%vs 38.1%,P<0.01).The MACE of in-hospital and 30 d follow-up,peripheral vascular disease and renal failure showed no difference among 3 groups.But the angina recurrence in single-PCI group was more frequent than that in other two re-PCI groups(P<0.01).Conclusion It is possible to obtain an ideal clinical outcome from treating the “no-culprit” stenosistic vessels by DES implantation in patients with multivessel lesions within 10 days after AMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?