Effect of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and stent implantation on left ventricular remodeling and function in patients with acute myocardial infarction: compared with thrombolytic therapy

任文林,胡大一,赵远华,李瑞杰,薛松维,梁玉清,曹永革,张晓红,张平娜,陈玻,彭夫松
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2002.02.004
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe prospectively the changes of left ventricular size and function, and to evaluate the impact of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p-PTCA) and stent implantation and thrombolytic therapy on left ventricular remodeling and function. Methods The patients with a first acute myocardial infarct and without contraindications to thrombolytic therapy were randomly assingned to p-PTCA group or urokinase (1?500?000 IU) therapy group within 12 hrs from the onset of symptoms or within 12~24 hrs if the evidence of myocardial ischemia in infarc zones was available. Two-demensional echocardaography were applied in the 2 nd , 12 th , and 24 th week after infarction, and major cardiac events were recorded. Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled (male 55, female 10, age 58.95±8.94 y). The patency of infarct related artery of 32 patients assigned to p-PTCA was 100%, while that of thrombolytic therapy group (33 patients) was 75.76%. The differences of end-systolic volume index (ESVI), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and regional wall motion score index (RWMI) were significant statistically between p-PTCA group and thrombolytic therapy group ( P 0.05, P 0.05, P 0.01, P 0.05, respectively) in 2 nd week after infarction. The trend was true of that of the 12 th week after infarction. Between p-PTCA group and thrombolytic therapy group in the 24 th week after infarction, there was no significant difference in EDVI, LVEF, and RWMI, except ESVIference in global wall motion score index (GWMI) during the whole observation period. Conclusion Compared with urokinase therapy, p-PTCA would have better effect on preventing left ventricular remodeling and improving left ventricular function. The latter might reduce the necessity for revascularization also.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?