Impact of Regional Perfusion and Viability of Infracted Area on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Function in Patients after PCI Therapy

张卫方,王荣福,张燕燕,李欣欣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-1703.2009.03.002
2009-01-01
Abstract:To evaluate the impact of regional perfusion and viability of infracted area on left ventricular remodeling and function in patient after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) therapy,twenty anterior myocardial infarction patients with PCI in 20 hours were involved,whose CAG coronary blood flows have been normal.Rest DISA SPECT imagines were performed in 10 days after PCI.According to the myocardium viability and the baseline severity of perfusion in the infracted area(LAD extent %),the patients were divided into two groups.In different groups,echocardiography LVEDD and LVEF were recorded as baseline and follow-up evaluations of cardiac remodeling and function at 1 week and 12 months after PCI.The results showed that the UCG LVEDD changed slightly in two groups of patients with viable(n=10) and without viable myocardium in infarcted area(n=10),but there was no significant difference.In patients with viable myocardium,average 3.46% LVEF increase compared with that 1% decrease in patients without viable myocardium in infracted area.The UCG LVEDD did not changed significantly in both groups with different severity of perfusion in the infarcted area.A trend toward an increase of LVEF was documented for patients with severity of perfusion in the infracted area less than 50%(n=9,39.89±10.19% vs.42.22±13.54%,P0.05),but LVEF did not improve for patients with LAD extent % more than 50%(n=11,42.55±6.86% vs.41.2±8.32%).Compared to patients with lower MIBI uptake and without viable myocardium,there was a significantly higher average improvement of LVEF in five patients with lower MIBI uptake and simultaneously with viable myocardium in infracted area,LVEF increased 4.8%,P=0.029.The study of AMI patients after PCI therapy showed that in patients with higher sestamibi uptake or with viable myocardium,especially higher sestamibi uptake and viable myocardium in the same patient,the LVEF increased better than it in patients with lower sestamibi uptake or without viable myocardium in infracted area 12 months after PCI.Patients with low perfusion and no viable myocardium have worse cardiac function and ventricular remodeling 12 months after PCI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?