A Comparative Study of Primary Angioplasty with Intravenous Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Using 99 Tc M -MIBI SPECT Imaging

Tie Wang,Jia Sanqing,Tianchang Li,Fang Chen,Dayi Hu,Cui Liang,Wu Xiuduo
1999-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate and compare the therapeutic effectiveness of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with that of intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using 99 Tc m MIBI myocardial SPECT imaging Methods A total of 124 patients with AMI was undergoing primary PTCA (PTCA group, 60 patients) or intravenous thrombolysis therapy (thrombolysis group, 64 patients) 99 Tc m MIBI myocardium SPECT imaging was performed 2 weeks and 12 weeks after the onset of AMI Two to three days after scanning, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured by radionuclide gated cardiac blood pool imaging on 38 patients in PTCA group and 35 patients in thrombolysis group Results The following imaging parameters and LVEF in PTCA and thrombolysis groups were compared in pairs: S2WS (score of scanning after 2 weeks) was 18 3±6 9 vs 28 6±7 3 (t=7 3, P0 001), S12WS (score of scanning after 12 weeks) was 11 2±4 2 vs 24 4±6 2 (t=11 7, P0 001), SDS (S2WS S12WS) was 7 6±3 2 vs 4 3±1 1 (t=5 4, P0 001) LVEF of PTCA group and thrombolysis group at 2 weeks was (41 4±6 5)% and (39 5±7 2)% (t=1 5, P0 05) After 12 weeks LVEF were (62 6±7 8)% and (51 4±8 8)% (t=7 4, P0 001) Conclusions 99 Tc m MIBI myocardial SPECT imaging has been proved to be an objective parameter for evaluating the therapeutic effectiveness of the PTCA and intravenous thrombolysis in treatment of AMI At the same time, the results indicate that primary PTCA seems to be more effective than intravenous thrombolysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?