Comparision of Different Strategies to Reduce Thrombus Burden During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

马玉良,王伟民,刘健,卢明瑜,王龙,李琪,刘传芬

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2010.01.003

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between simple percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombus-aspiration and/or GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist in the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods We reviewed 179 STEMI patients whom received PPCI from 2007.1-2009.6. The patients were catagorized into 3 groups including simple primary percutaneous coronary intervention group (n=74), thrombus-aspiration or GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist group (n=59) and thrombus-aspiration plus GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist group (n=46).The rate of no-reflow or slow-reflow, ST-segment elevation resolution (STR70%), peak value time of CK-MB and TNI, UCG results of LVEF and LVDd, the rate of massive haemorrhage and in-hospital mortality were compared.Results Comparing with the simple primary PCI group, patients with thrombus-aspiration plus GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist had lower rate of no-reflow or slow-reflow (6.5% vs 20.3%, P0.05) and had higher rate of 70% STR (54.3% vs 23.0%, P0.05). Patients with thrombus-aspiration or GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist also showed lower rate of no-reflow or slow-reflow (10.2% vs 20.3%, P0.05) and higher rate of 70% STR (37.3% vs 23.0%, P0.05) but there were no statistical differences when compared with the simple PCI group. The peak time of CK-MB and TNI, UCG results of LVEF and LVDd, in-hospital mortality and the incidence of massive haemorrhage were of no differences among the three groups (all P0.05).Conclusion The combination of thrombus-aspiration and GP Ⅱb/Ⅲa antagonist can reduce thrombus burden, prevent no-reflow and improve myocardial reperfusion in patients with STEMI during PPCI.