Treating acute ST elevation myocardial infarction with PCI combined with distal protection devices or glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor inhibitors in patients of high-burden thrombus

叶飞,陈绍良,马玉玲,朱中生,张俊杰,林松,田乃亮,常芸,刘玲玲,阚静,段宝祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2009.10.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of distal protection devices(DPD) and glycoprotein 2b/3a receptor inhibitors (GPⅡb/Ⅲa)-tirofiban for treating acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during primary interventional therary (PCI) in the patients with high-burden thrombus in the infract-related artery (IRA).Methods High-burden thrombus formation in the IRA was found in 106 patients with acute STEMI,who were divided into 3 groups of conventional PCI group(A),DPD group(B) and GPⅡb/Ⅲa group(C). The TIMI flow grade and TIMI myocardial perfusion (TMP) grade of the IRA were assessed immediately after the performance of PCI,and the 30-day and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs),bleeding and transfusion were evaluated.Results The TIMI flow grades of groups of A,B and C were 2.41±0.50,2.65±0.48 and 2.68±0.47,TMP grades were 2.03±0.65,2.31±0.48 and 2.37±0.54,MACEs for 30 days were (16.2±37.4)%,(8.6±28.4)% and (7.9±2.7)%,and MACEs for 1-year were (29.7±46.3)%,(14.3±35.5)% and (18.4±39.3)%,respectively.The above values were better in groups of B and C than those in group A (P<0.05).The bleeding and transfusion within 72 hours were not significantly different among 3 groups. Conclusion DPD and GPⅡb/Ⅲa were effective and safe for treating STEMI in the patients with high-burden thrombus in the IRA with better TIMI flow grade and TMP grade than those in conventional PCI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?