Therapeutic Effect of Thrombus Suck Combined with Glycoprotein IIbIIIa Receptor Inhibitors on Patients with Myocardial Infarction and High Thrombus Burden of Coronary

LI Yin-fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0074.2011.06.21
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To study the therapeutic effect of thrombus suck catheter(ZEEK catheter) combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors(GPⅡb/Ⅲa) on acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in patients with high thrombus burden of coronary.Methods: A total of 136 STEMI patients were randomly divided into routine PCI group(n=44),GPⅡb/Ⅲa group(n=45) and GPⅡb/Ⅲa + thrombus aspiration(TA) group(n=47).Analyses were performed on blood flow grades of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction trial(TIMI)of infract-related arteries(IRA) instant after PCI,thrombolysis in myocardial infarction myocardial perfusion(TMP)classifications of infarct sites,ratios of bleeding and blood transfusion within 72h after PCI and major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) within 30d and one year after PCI.Results: Compared with routine PCI group,TIMI blood flow grades of IRA [(2.31±0.50) vs.(2.52±0.48) vs.(2.69±0.47)] and TMP classifications [(2.03±0.65) vs.(2.31±0.48) vs.(2.51±0.54)] significantly increased instant after PCI in GPⅡb/Ⅲa group and GPⅡb/Ⅲa + TA group,and GPⅡb/Ⅲa + TA group was significantly higher than those of GPⅡb/Ⅲa group,P0.05 all;incidence rates of MACE within 30d and one year after PCI in GPⅡb/Ⅲa group and GPⅡb/Ⅲa + TA group were significantly lower than those of routine PCI group [30d:(9.6±28.4)%,(7.1±21.7)% vs.(16.2±37.4)%,one year:(16.3±35.5)%,(12.4±39.3)% vs.(29.7±46.3)%],P0.01 all.There were no significant difference in ratios of bleeding and blood transfusion within 72h after PCI among the three groups.Conclusion: Combined application of thrombus suck catheter and GPⅡb/Ⅲa is safe and effective for treatment of acute STEMI during primary PCI in patients with high thrombus burden in coronary arteries;and their instant obtained TIMI blood flow and myocardial perfusion were better than those of routine PCI group and GPⅡb/Ⅲa group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?