Offence-defence Theory: Towards a Definitive Understanding
Tang Shiping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq004
2010-01-01
The Chinese Journal of International Politics
Abstract:Offence-defence theory (ODT) dominates the understanding of many security and international relations (IR) theorists of the role in international politics that military technology plays. ODT has produced some of the most cited works in realism literature,1 as evident in the many works which—implicitly and explicitly—rely on ODT to propel their arguments.2 ODT is classified in such literature as quintessential defensive realism theory,3 and also identified as an important demarcation line between offensive and defensive realism.4 The impact of ODT goes far beyond that which it has made on strategic studies and the broader literature of realism. Its influence is such that even non-realists such as Robert Keohane, Lisa Martin, and Alexander Wendt have invoked ODT logic to operate arguments that counter the logic of (offensive) realism.5 ODT has always had its critics6 who, as they become more sophisticated over the years, often question the theory’s very foundations.7 ODT proponents have responded with a vigorous defence of both its validity and utility for understanding international politics. They tout its virtues of being structural and parsimonious,8 pointing out attempts still being made to reformulate, refine, and test ODT.9 As it now stands, however, the validity and utility of ODT remain contested and unresolved.10