Abstract:The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Khill provided a novel moral framework for self-defence. Whereas self-defence was previously categorized as a justification, the Court now maintains that it constitutes an excuse in some cases. In other cases, the Court suggests self-defence sits between justification and excuse, captured by a principle I elsewhere call ‘moral permissibility’. The Court’s choice to adopt a more robust relationship between the moral principles underlying justification/excuse and self-defence is principled. However, the basis for that conclusion—the application of moral philosophy to the law of criminal defences—applies with equal force to the law of duress and necessity. Unfortunately, the statutory duress defence and section 8(3) of the Criminal Code limit the juristic scope of those defences. Although these restrictions may be challenged under section 7 of the Charter, this challenge will likely fail as defendants need not be denied a defence. Instead, they will be denied a proper moral assessment of their actions. To instill greater coherency into the law, it is prudent to repeal the statutory duress defence. This approach would allow courts to utilize the broad wording of the new ‘defence of person’ provision to develop the law of self-defence, necessity, and duress in line with the moral philosophy underlying these defences. Constitutionalizing the principles underlying criminal defences can nevertheless serve two broader purposes: mitigating the tendency of courts and counsel to unduly rely upon other less transparent (jury nullification) or heavy-handed (judicial review) legal devices to avoid conviction.

Justifiable Defense:Standard Interpretation from the Perspective of Comparison Between Criminal and Civil Law Chinese Full Text

Justifiable Defense, Excessive Self-defense and No Excessive Self-defense

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The Research of the Relativity of Self-defense

A New Suggestion of Legitimate Defense

The Defense of Lawful Alternative in Civil Law

On Defense and Right to Defense

An Exploration of the Subject of Legitimate Defence

Comparison Between Japanese and Chinese Principles of Criminal Prosecution

When American Law Meets Chinese Law Eye to Eye: How Two Legal Systems Approach the Duty to Protect

Comparison between the Two Crime Systems in the Two Main Legal Systems and the Reference to That in China

The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law

Defensibility of Violation of Public Legitimate Interests Under Typological Thinking

The Protection of the Defendant’s Rights in Criminal Trial by Default — From the Perspective of Due Process

The rebutment on crime system in Germany and Japan

The Common Sense Perspective of Criminal Law

The Compare of Tort Law's General Provision between China and Germany

A Comparative Survey of Similarities of Doctrines Concerning Constitution of Crimes

A Comparative Research on the Object of Tort Law

A Systemic Comparison of the Execution of the Law in the Two Great Legal Systems from the Perspective of Property Law

The Specific Provisions of Criminal Code and the Basic Theory of Criminal Law' s Interpretation