Abstract:The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Khill provided a novel moral framework for self-defence. Whereas self-defence was previously categorized as a justification, the Court now maintains that it constitutes an excuse in some cases. In other cases, the Court suggests self-defence sits between justification and excuse, captured by a principle I elsewhere call ‘moral permissibility’. The Court’s choice to adopt a more robust relationship between the moral principles underlying justification/excuse and self-defence is principled. However, the basis for that conclusion—the application of moral philosophy to the law of criminal defences—applies with equal force to the law of duress and necessity. Unfortunately, the statutory duress defence and section 8(3) of the Criminal Code limit the juristic scope of those defences. Although these restrictions may be challenged under section 7 of the Charter, this challenge will likely fail as defendants need not be denied a defence. Instead, they will be denied a proper moral assessment of their actions. To instill greater coherency into the law, it is prudent to repeal the statutory duress defence. This approach would allow courts to utilize the broad wording of the new ‘defence of person’ provision to develop the law of self-defence, necessity, and duress in line with the moral philosophy underlying these defences. Constitutionalizing the principles underlying criminal defences can nevertheless serve two broader purposes: mitigating the tendency of courts and counsel to unduly rely upon other less transparent (jury nullification) or heavy-handed (judicial review) legal devices to avoid conviction.

An Exploration of the Subject of Legitimate Defence

A New Suggestion of Legitimate Defense

Defensibility of Violation of Public Legitimate Interests Under Typological Thinking

Justifiable Defense, Excessive Self-defense and No Excessive Self-defense

Justifiable Defense:Standard Interpretation from the Perspective of Comparison Between Criminal and Civil Law Chinese Full Text

Conflict and Coexistence of the Public/Private Law Ideas in Criminal Procedure——Taking the Victim's Right to Participation in English As Reserch Sample

The Research of the Relativity of Self-defense

On Procedural Defense

On Defense and Right to Defense

A Study on Procedural Defence

The Defense of Lawful Alternative in Civil Law

Research on the Legality Principle in International Human Rights Law and China's Criminal System

Rational Construction and Legislative Provision of the Rights System of CriminalDefence Lawyer

An Analysis on the Involution of China’s Litigation Object Theory

The Framework of Doctrines of Criminalization Based on Violation and Culpability

The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law

Victim's Perspective and Reconstruction of Criminal Law Theory

Criticism on Several Points of "Legal Truth" Doctrine

Research on the Protection of Rights for Defense Attorneys

On the Acceptance of the Victim

A Re-Discussion of the Larceny's Object of Act——From the Perspective of Legal Interests Theory