Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On the Theory of Coordinating Defense

On the Autonomous Right to Counsel of the Defendant:Analysis Based upon Defendant's Right to Meet

On the Basic Philosophy of Criminal Reconciliation——Comparative Study between Zhejiang "Fengqiao Experience" and U.S. VOR Model

Research on the Protection of Rights for Defense Attorneys

On Procedural Defense

The Adversarialness and the Cooperation in Judicial Process

To Provide for New Rights or To Strengthen Remedies?

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

The Appointed Defense System in the New Criminal Procedure Law

A Study on Procedural Defence

Rereflections on the Legal Procedures of Connection between Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice

The Protection of the Defendant’s Rights in Criminal Trial by Default — From the Perspective of Due Process

Dynamics of Argumentation Systems: A Basic Theory

Constitution of the Attorney in the Criminal Process

Separate Grounds for the Obligatory Involvement of a Defense Counsel in a Criminal Case as a Procedural Safeguard

Research on the Duty Lawyer's Function of Effective Advocacy in Misdemeanor Cases of Guilty Plea

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

Thoughts on the right division between the technical defense office and the department of economy and culture defense

The Reform and Improvement of the Rule of Third Party Without Independent Claims

On the Trial Mode Centralized on Files and Notes

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure