Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

On Establishing Seprarate Process of Sentence in China

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal

Study on the Sociological Model of Conviction and Sentencing

Interaction of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Changed for Fair Sentencing

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

On the Operation of Procedures Related to the Separation of Conviction and Sentence

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

On the Trial Mode Centralized on Files and Notes

Mean of Declaratory Sentence of Crime without Statutory Sentencing Factors and Its Significance

On Procedural Defense

Sentencing Disparities in Corruption Cases in China

Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic

Chief Prosecutor System --another Commentary on Judicial Independence

Chinese Mode of Illegal Evidences' Exclusion

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System