Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

On Procedural Defense

A Study on Procedural Defence

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

On Proceduralized Constitution

On the Protection of Procedural Interests

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

Dislocation and Rectification: Reflection on System of Adjudicatory Supervision

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Frontiers of the Civil Procedural Law Theory

Jurisprudential Thinking on the Perfection of Civil Procuratorial Power

Views on Conducting Civil Proceedings by Procuratorial Institutions

A Preliminary Research on Failure of Criminal Procedure

Introduction Theory and Practice Court Procedural Law Constitution