Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

On the Operation of Procedures Related to the Separation of Conviction and Sentence

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

On Establishing Seprarate Process of Sentence in China

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

On the Independence of Sentencing Process

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure

A Jurisprudential Analysis on Procedural Sanction System

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

Interaction of Sentencing and Conviction:Charges Changed for Fair Sentencing

The Substantial Perspective and Procedural Study on Due Pre-detention

Procedure Division in the Amendments to the Civil Procedure Law

Death Sentence with a Two-Year Reprieve Shall Be an Inevitable Due Process

Study on the Functions of Criminal Procedure

Study on the Sociological Model of Conviction and Sentencing

Summary Procedure and Its Future in Chinese Civil Procedural Law

For the Procedural Amelioration of the Criminal Trial

On the efficiency to ensure the fast processing procedure of minor criminal cases

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal