Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

On the efficiency to ensure the fast processing procedure of minor criminal cases

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Standardization and Development: Brief Discussion on Chinese Quick Transaction Mechanism of Minor Criminal Case

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure

The Re-amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law in the Perspective of Investigating Efficiency

On the Protection of the Defendants' Rights in Summary Criminal Procedure

Win Some, Lose Some: Reforms of China’s Simplified Criminal Procedure

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

From Theory to Practice:The Judicial Way to Carry out Criminal Policies of Penalty Reprieve Against Juvenile Crimes

Abolishing the System of Labor Education-rehabilitation and Make the Joining Mechanism Between the Investigation and Trial for Minor Criminal Cases Dovetail

The Perfection of Non-penalty Rectification System about Minor Crime in our Country

Thoughts on "Speeding Minor Crimes" in Criminal Judicial reform

Research on the Influencing Factors of Discretionary Non-prosecution

Improving the Pace of Criminal Case Processing in State Trial Courts

The Application of the Criminal Law and of the Policy“Less Arrest or Death Penalty and More Leniency”in the Criminal Cases Involving National Minority Citizens

Characteristics Comparison between Policy of Tempering Justice with Mercy and Policy of Punishment in Accordance with Crime

A Positive Study of Summary Trials in General Criminal Procedure

The Criminal Policy of Temper Justice with Mercy and the Reform of Fine Penalty

Improvement of Retrial Procedure and Maintenance of the Validity of Cases Adjudicated

On the Mechanism of Disposing the Case Where the Defendant Pleads Guilty

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform