Abstract:The primary subject of the sentencing procedural reform is to establish an appropriate sentencing procedural model to coordinate the relationship between conviction and sentencing proceedings reasonably. Although the newly established reform program by the Supreme People's Court can be feasibly implemented in the guilty plea cases, it would meet some difficulties in both summary cases and general procedures and even face some theoretical disputes and real risks. Through the experimental exploration of the grassroots courts, a model named "centralized sentencing model", basing on the mass—appearance of prosecutors, has gradually taken shape in summary proceedings. In this model, after the indictment which confirms the defendant has constituted a crime, the court hears a number of cases prosecuted by prosecutors in a continuous sentencing hearing and gives their sentencing decisions respectively. In cases where the defendant pleas not guilty, the viewpoints for the establishment of an "independent sentencing procedure" are came out and supported by some law experts and the judiciary. This model means that the court trial shall be divided into two relatively independent stages, that is, conviction and the sentencing hearing. The court should firstly settle down whether the accused has constituted a crime or not through investigation and court debates. After the declaration of conviction, the court will organize a special sentencing proceeding. By listening to the views of both defense lawyers and prosecutors and reviewing the statutory and discretionary sentencing circumstances, the court then makes the final decisions on the sentencing issue of the accused. In cases where the defendant voluntarily pleas guilty, the "flexible alternating sentencing model" still leaves some spaces for further improvement. So the sentencing procedural reform is far from maturity. The policy—makers of the reform should not be complacent and conservative. For these self—engendered reform experiences, the reformers should not blindly adopt the attitude of rejection, but instead should face up to the reasonableness of their existence and assess their effectiveness, so as to make them play a greater role in the formation of a new system.

A Positive Study of Summary Trials in General Criminal Procedure

Public Opinions on Criminal Trials in China: A Comparative Study of Chinese College Students in the PRC and Hong Kong

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Simplified Trial:Challenges and Responses in the Reform Process

Research on the Online Live Broadcasts of Criminal Trial: An Empirical Analysis Based on Questionnaire Survey

On the Protection of the Defendants' Rights in Summary Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

Summary Procedure and Its Future in Chinese Civil Procedural Law

Win Some, Lose Some: Reforms of China’s Simplified Criminal Procedure

On the Trial Mode Centralized on Files and Notes

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Civil Summary Procedure and the Formation of the Society under the Rule of Law

Models of Sentencing Procedural Reform

A Study of "Judge-Defendant Bargain" in Criminal Proceedings

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure

Effects of Judicial Pre-judgment on Conviction

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

Empirical Study on the System of Jurors for Criminal Cases:A Case Study of J Province and C City’s Grass-roots Courts

On the efficiency to ensure the fast processing procedure of minor criminal cases