Comparison of Reconstruction Methods in Multi-Slice CT Coronary Angiography

毛定飚,滑炎卿,张国桢,王鸣鹏,吴威岚,胡非,葛虓俊,丁其勇
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2004.03.010
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of different reformation techniques in assessing coronary artery disease. Methods: Twenty patients were studied by 16-slice spiral CT(retrospective ECG-gating; 0.42s rotation). Each patient's CT data set was evaluated using transverse scanning, volume rendering technique, maximum intensity projection, curved multiplanar reformations and CT virtual endoscopic reformation. The results were compared with coronary artery angiography. Results: In the 136 coronary artery segments(vessel diameter≥2mm) of 20 patients, 122 were judged to be diagnosed by CT(89.7%). Transverse scanning showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenosis≥50%(81.2% and 94.4%), followed by virtual endoscopy(71.8% and 84.4%), maximum intensity projection(68.7% and 84.4%), curved multiplanar reformations(65.6% and 87.7%), volume rendering(65.6% and 74.4%). Combined with all techniques, the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of stenosis≥50% were 87.5% and 96.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Transverse scanning showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for the detection of stenosis≥50%. 16-slice spiral CT could be used as a noninvasive method for the assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis with high accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?