A comparative study of spiral CT portography and 3D dynamic contrast enhanced MR angiography of the portal vein

吴东,周康荣,陈祖望,林江,王建华,颜志平,程洁敏,钱晟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2002.12.020
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical value of spiral CT portography (CTP) and 3D dynamic contrast enhanced MR angiography (3D DCEMRA) correlating with conventional portography (CP) Methods Thirty eight patients underwent CTP, 3D DCEMRA, and CP with interval of 0-3 days The clinical value of CTP and 3D DCEMRA was analyzed and compared with the golden standard of CP, including: (1) the imaging quality of portal vein; (2) the patency of the portal vein; (3) the distribution and extent of collaterals; (4) the average charge of both exams Results The total score of imaging quality of the portal vein shown by CTP was 617 correspondent with that of 3D DCEMRA (602) ( t =1 561, P 0 05) The percentage of agreement in the demonstration of the patency of the portal vein between CTP and CP and between 3D DCEMRA and CP was 95 6%(109/114)and 96 5%(110/114), respectively (χ 2=0 814, P 0 05) The percentage of agreement in each method in dimensioning the collaterals reached 97 1%(33/34)comparing with CP The average charge of both exams was $991 and $1 341, respectively Conclusion Both methods of CTP and 3D DCEMRA can well determine the portal venous patency and the existence of varices, and well correlate with the conventional portography CP would be replaced in a great extent by non invasive technology in the future
What problem does this paper attempt to address?