Abstract:Objective Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a relatively common and potentially fatal disorder. Clinical presentation and scintigraphy are highly useful for the diagnosis of acute PTE. This study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and concordance of different scintigraphic and clinical algo-rithms in the diagnosis of acute PTE. Methods One hundred and four consecutive patients with suspected acute PTE were enrolled and they underwent perfusion/ventilation (Q/V) scintigraphy, contrast enhanced multi slice spiral CT pulmonary angiography ( CTPA), chest radiography and other tests from October 2005 to July 2007. The analysis and subsequent grading of probability of pulmonary embolism were undertaken using three methods: the McMaster clinical criteria, the refined modified prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (RM-PIOPED) criteria, and the prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary em-bolism diagnosis (PISA-PED) criteria. Kappa test was used to analyze the degree of agreement among the diagnostic criteria. The differences between the diagnostic criteria were tested for significance using paramet-ric chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The final clinical diagnosis was based on all imaging modalities, all available laboratory records, medical history and clinical therapeutic re-sponse. This "final clinical diagnosis" was regarded as the "gold standard" of this study. Results The concordance of PISA-PED criteria and RM-PIOPED criteria was good (Kappa = 0.92, P<0.05). Howev-er, the concordance of RM-PIOPED criteria and McMaster clinical criteria and the concordance of PISA-PED criteria and McMaster clinical criteria were low ( both Kappa =0.35, both P>0.05). Acute PTE was diagnosed in 55 (52.9%, 55/104) of the 104 patients. The sensitivities of McMaster clinical criteria, RM-PIOPED criteria and PISA-PED criteria were 69.1% (38/55), 90.9% (50/55) and 92.7% (51/55),respectively; the specificities were 73.5% (36/49), 73.5% (36/49) and 75.5% (37/49), respective-ly; the total consistent rates were 71.2% (74/104), 82.7% (86/104) and 84.6% (88/104), respec-tively. There was no statistical difference between the specificity of the three algorithms (X2=0.00,0.05, 0.05, all P>0.05). There was also no statistical difference between the sensitivities of RM-PIOPED criteria and PISA-PED criteria (X2=0.12, P>0.05). However, there was statistical difference between the sensitiv-ities of RM-PIOPED criteria and McMaster clinical criteria X2=8.18,P<0.05) and between PISA-PED criteria and McMaster clinical criteria (X2=9.95,P<0.05). Conclusions RM-PIOPED criteria and PISA-PED criteria both had good diagnostic accuracy in acute pulmonary embolism, and their correlative concord-ance was good. McMaster clinical criteria had relatively lower sensitivity and it should not be used alone.

Comparison of lung scintigraphy and multi-slice spiral CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Comparison of test bolus and bolus tracking techniques for dual-energy CT lung perfusion scan

CTPA Versus Ventilation-Perfusion Scan in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism

Multi-slice CT Pulmonary Arteriography:Comparison of Bolus Tracking with Pretest Time-density Curve Technique

High-pitch dual-source CT pulmonary angiography in naturally breathing patients

A comparison between ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy and multislice spiral CT in the diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Clinical evaluation of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Diagnostic Efficacy of Lung Perfusion Scan Interpreted by PISAPED Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison with CTPA

Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography

Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: prospective comparison of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography

[Optimization of Scan Protocol in Pulmonary Angiography of Second Generation Dual Source Computed Tomography].

CT pulmonary angiograghy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism:a Meta analysis

Application of Technegas/~(99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin lung perfusion scan in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism

Diagnostic efficacy of perfusion scans interpreted by PISA-PED criteria for pulmonary embolism:comparison with CTPA

Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography.

Comparison of Helical CT Pulmonary Angiography with Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy on the Sensitivity and Specificity for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism:An Experiment Study

Comparison of Scintigraphic RM-PIOPED Criteria and PISA-PED Criteria in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Comparison of Different Imaging Examination for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism by Multidector Spiral CT Pulmonary Angiographgy

CT Angiography of Pulmonary Arteries for Detecting Pulmonary Embolism: Obtaining the Optimal Phase of Pulmonary Artery Enhancement with Volume Helical Shuttle Technique7

Chinese multi-center study of lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism