Clinical evaluation of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

王茜,黄俐俐,秦淑玲,岳明纲,李河北

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2004.10.006

2004-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the clinical capability of ventilation-perfusion(V-P) scintigraphy and spiral CT angiography(SCTA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism(PE). Methods: Sixty-five patients with suspected PE underwent V-P scintigraphy and SCTA. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing PE were calculated for V-P scintigrams and SCTA scans, comparing with the final clinical diagnosis. Results: The sensitivity for detection of PE with V-P scintigraphy and SCTA was 86.2% and 79.3%, respectively, and the specificity was 72.2% and 91.7%, respectively. The accuracy of SCTA(86.2%) was significantly higher than that of V-P scintigraphy(78.5%)(P=0.01). Non-diagnostic result was found in 16.9% of the subjects on V-P scintigraphy, and 4.6% on SCTA. Non-diagnostic results on V-P scintigraphy were usually seen in those patients who had heart or other pulmonary disorder. If the non-diagnostic results were excluded, the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of V-P scintigraphy tend to be better than that of SCTA. By combining V-P scintigraphy and SCTA, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were improved to 93.1%, 94.4% and 93.8%, respectively. Conclusion: SCTA is more accurate in the diagnostic procedure of PE comparing with the V-P scintigraphy, and should be the first choice. However, V-P scintigraphy still is a promising method if the subjects were selected properly. The combination of V-P scintigraphy and SCTA will be most accurate.