Abstract:In environmental tort lawsuits, China has been overly focused on “punishing” violators and has neglected the value of ecological environment restoration. The Article 1234 of Civil Code of China in 2021 has provided an important institutional guideline for the restoration of ecological environment and sustainable development in China. This paper analyzes 512 cases of ecological environment restoration liability and identifies five challenges in the judicial context: the lack of sound legal regulation, the lack of liability allocation, the mismatch of liability subjects, the difficulty of identifying damage facts, and the difficulty of effective implementation of restoration. In the face of these difficulties, countries that attach importance to ecological environment restoration, such as the United States, Germany and Japan, have provided experience that can be drawn on for China's ecological environment restoration liability. Based on foreign experience, China's liability for ecological environment restoration should be improved in the following aspects: first, to improve the legal system from basic laws and specific laws; second, to expand the scope of subjects from both litigation request subjects and liability subjects; third, to improve the identification and assessment mechanism and innovate the identification and assessment procedures in accordance with China's national conditions; fourth, to determine the restoration methods based on the criterion of “utilization value and the differences in the objects. The ultimate goal is to help China's Civil Code to be better applied judicially on the one hand, and to contribute to the world ecological protection on the other.

The Application and Development of US Nuisance Law for the Remedies of Environmental Torts

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Environmental Administrative Litigation and Elimination of Environmental Harm

Theory and Practice of American Environmental Toxic Tort Remedy——Based on Comparison and Analysis of Three Typical Cases

Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement

Fundamental Ideas of Legal Remedy for Environment Tort

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

The development, shortcomings and future improvement of punitive damages for environmental torts in China—a reflection and comparative research

Clarifying the Subject of the Environmental Public Interest Lawsuit System

To Establish a Liability Insurance System on Environmental Tort in China

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

On The Expansion of Plaintiff’s Standing and Reasonable Limit in Environmental Litigation

Group Litigation System about Environment Infringement

On the Distribution of Burden of Proof on Causation in Environmental Tort——Also on the interpretation and application of article 66 of the tort law

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

An Exploration of Law Predicament of Environmental Right and the Solutions

Study on the application of the system of punitive damages for ecological environmental infringement in Civil Code

Research on Tortious Liability of Third-party Treatment of Environmental Pollution in Mode of Enterprise-enterprise Cooperation

The Application Scope of Lien

The Public Life of Private Law: Tort Law as a Risk Regulation Mechanism