Abstract:Many have pointed at the fact that the spectacular economic growth in China has come at a high price, especially concerning the environmental costs related to this growth. There is increasing literature available now, both in and outside of China on the available governance instruments that China is increasingly using in its fight against environmental pollution. Indeed, with growing economic welfare also the demand for environmental quality is increasing in China as well. An issue which received less attention so far was the ex post compensation after environmental pollution occurred. The aim of our study is not so much to look at instruments aiming at prevention of environmental harm, but to address the question to what extent victims of environmental harm can be compensated for this harm in China. The concept of victims should obviously be interpreted broadly since victims could also be the environment at large in which case the question arises to what extent for example the government or an NGO may have the right to ask remedies on behalf of the environment. The goal of our study is not only to provide an insight into the “law in the books” by sketching which instruments and remedies are available, but also to address “law in action”, by examining to what extent the various compensation mechanisms are indeed applied in practice as well. To that end we have undertaken some interviews with stakeholders in China in order to obtain information on the way in which environmental damage is being remedied. Our focus is on remedies for environmental harm. Even though the main (traditional) remedy after damage may be (monetary) compensation, in case of environmental pollution other remedies (such as restitution) may be relevant as well. Methodologically we will therefore both address available remedies on the basis of the regulatory framework, but also examine to what extent these remedies are indeed applied. Moreover, we will normatively where appropriate, also formulate a few suggestions for reform. The question of how to compensate for environmental damage has become a hot topic in China. Almost every day one now can read about cases of environmental harm with which various Chinese communities are confronted whereby almost every time the question is asked how adequate compensation for this harm can be provided. The issue is also topical given recent legislative changes in China. In December 2009 China introduced a New Tort Liability Law in which important provisions also deal with environmental liability. Moreover, even though environmental insurance markets are not yet that well developed in China increasingly both potential victims as well as industry are demanding the development of adequate insurance products to deal with environmental harm. Strikingly the only domain in which compensation seems to work adequately, not only on paper but also in practice is the domain of marine oil pollution in which international conventions have played an important role. Our paper is set up as follows: after an introduction (1) we will first focus on the role of liability rules in compensating for environmental harm (2), then we focus on insurance (3) and discuss the specific case of marine oil pollution (4). For every topic first the theoretical possibilities to provide compensation will be sketched; next the question will be addressed what role these mechanisms lay in practice. A few concluding remarks (5) will provide a summary and some policy recommendations.

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

[Environmental Damage Assessment: International Regulations and Revelation to China].

Policy Evaluation and Framework Discussion of Ecological Compensation Mechanism in China

An empirical examination of liability for ecological environment restoration in the context of the Civil Code of China

Legislative and judicial responses to public health protection under eco-environmental damage relief in China

Study on Ecological Environment Damage Compensation in China

Research on the Judicial Application of The Punitive Damages System for Environmental Infringement

Ladm-Based Model For Natural Resource Administration In China

Compensation for Environmental Damage in China: Theory and Practice

The development, shortcomings and future improvement of punitive damages for environmental torts in China—a reflection and comparative research

Types of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China and Exploration of New Frontiers

A Brief Study on How to Perfect the System of Civil Liability Caused by Environmental Pollution

Study on the application of the system of punitive damages for ecological environmental infringement in Civil Code

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Public Interest Litigation of Marine Environmental Pollution in China

Eco-compensation in China: Theory, practices and suggestions for the future.

Advances in theory and methodology of ecological compensation

Corporate environmental infringement, legal regulation, and sustainable development: punitive damages as a perspective

Finding Structural Imbalance: A Theoretical Explanation to the Failure of China's Environmental Regulations

An Exploration of Law Predicament of Environmental Right and the Solutions

Analysis on the Low Efficient Allocation of Environmental Resources and the Facts That the Advantaged Groups Capture the Natural Capital

The Countermeasures to Deficiency on Current Laws and Policies of Renewable Resources