Diagnostic Value of 640-Slice CT Urography Low Lose Secretory Phase in Calyceal Diverticulum

liang zhandong,liu yanxia,liu yanfang,zhu yuexiang,cui shujun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.07.039
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss the diagnostic value of 640-slice CT urography low lose( tube voltage 80 kV + automatic m As + adaptive iterative dose reduction) excretory phase in calyceal diverticulum,and investigate the image characteristics. Methods 15 cases of calyceal diverticulum confirmed by surgery or IVP were included. All cases underwent 640-slice spiral CTU multi-phase scan,and the low-dose volume scan protocol was used during the secretory phase. The images of the CTU secretory phase before and after the scan were post-processed and analyzed and diagnosed by three different senior physicians( A,B,C). The scan volume CT dose index( CTDI vol),dose length product( DLP) of all patients were recorded,and the effective radiation dose( ED) was calculated. Results The coincidence rate of A doctor’s CTU secretory period was 13. 3%( 2/15) and 86. 7%( 13/15),respectively. The coincidence rate was statistically significant( χ~2=16. 13,P < 0. 05); The coincidence rate of pre-and post-diagnosis of CTU secretory phase was 6. 7%( 1/15) and 73. 3%( 11/15),respectively. The coincidence rate was statistically significant( χ~2= 13. 89,P < 0. 05); C physician secretory period The coincidence rates of pre-and post-diagnosis were 20%( 3/15) and 66. 7%( 10/15),respectively,and the coincidence rate was statistically significant( χ~2= 6. 65,P < 0. 05). Under the low dose volume scanning protocol,the singlephase average effective radiation dose ED decreased by 43. 0% compared with the cortical and medullary phases,and the CTDIvol decreased by 42. 9%. The effective radiation dose during the secretory phase only accounted for 15. 89% of the total effective radiation dose. Conclusion The low-dose volume scan of the 640-slice spiral CTU can not only improve the diagnostic accuracy of the renal diverticulum,but also significantly reduce the single-stage effective radiation dose. The clinical significance is significant and worthy of clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?