Comparasion of split-bolus 2-phase CT urography and classical single bolus CT urography in normal collecting system

王鹤,孙晓伟,王继琛,邱建星,许华,侯振亚,蒋学祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2009.11.039
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the efficacy of split-bolus 2-phase multi-slice computed tomographic urography (CTU) in reducing effective radiation dose compared with conventional single-bolus multi-phase CTU. Methods: Fifty-seven patients of hematuria and normal collecting system were enrolled. Thirty-one patients underwent single-bolus multi-phase CTU when the other 26 patients underwent split-bolus 2-phase CTU, and the images quality of CTU were evaluated according to the extent of expansion of renal pelvis, calices and ureter in secretory phase. All CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded, and the effective dose was calculated. CT value, inner diameter, imaging length and effective dose of each segment for both techniques of two groups were compared with Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: Significant difference was detected between between split-bolus 2-phase and single-bolus multi-phase CTU in CT values of each segment (P<0.05), but not in inner diameter, imaging length of renal pelvis, calices and ureter (P>0.05). The mean effective dose of split-bolus 2-phase CTU ([16.07 ± 0.47] mSv) was significantly lower than that of single-bolus multi-phase CTU ([26.12 ± 0.59] mSv, P<0.05). Conclusion: Split-bolus 2-phase CTU has the same in diagnosing efficacy of conventional single-bolus multi-phase CTU, while being able to reduce the effective dose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?