Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

Utility of High B-Value (2000 Sec/mm2) DWI with RESOLVE in Differentiating Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas and Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinomas from Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Diagnostic value of high b-value (2000 s/mm2) DWI for thyroid micronodules

Preoperative Prediction of the Extrathyroidal Extension of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Multi-B Values of MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

Differentiating Laryngeal Carcinomas from Precursor Lesions by Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 T: a Preliminary Study.

Comparative analysis of the image quality and diagnostic performance of the zooming technique with diffusion-weighted imaging using different b-values for thyroid papillary carcinomas and benign nodules

Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Thyroid Nodules with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Correlation

Rfov-Dwi and SMS-RESLOVE-DWI in Patients with Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.

[Effects of Different Computed High B-Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging Scores in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 of Prostate Cancer in Peripheral Zone].

Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules larger than 4 cm

Efficacy of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Predicting Aggressive Histological Features of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Can Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Be Used as a Tool to Predict Extrathyroidal Extension in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma?

Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules

MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Thyroid Nodules:Correlation with Pathology

Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Disease

ADC Values in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

A Comparative Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Ultrasound in Thyroid Nodules

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

Conspicuity of Breast Lesions at Different B Values on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

On the Utility of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging as a Tool in Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules

Diagnostic Value of Ultra-High B-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer