Abstract:Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of ADC for breast lesions with different enhancement shape or mass size. Methods One hundred and thirty-six breast lesions confirmed by histopathology were included in this study. According to enhancement shape and size of the lesion, all lesions were divided into 3 groups: non-masslike enhancement ( G1 ), masslike enhancement with the largest diameter ＜ 2. 0 cm (G2a) and masslike enhancement with the largest diameter ＞ 2. 0 cm (G2b). Echo planar imaging DWI was performed and three b-values (0,500 and 1000 s/mm2) were applied. The t-test was used for testing the difference of ADC between malignant and non-malignant breast lesions in each group. ROC curve was deduced to test the diagnostic efficiency of ADC. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value( NPV), positive predictive value(PPV) and accuracy of ADC for the diagnosis of breast lesions were calculated under the different threshold. Appropriate b value and threshold were determined with the combination of morphologic evaluation. Results There were no significant differences for the mean ADC values between malignant [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = ( 1.13 ±0. 23) × 10-3 mm2/s,b=1000 mm2/s: ADC value = (1.05 ±0.20) × 10-3 mm2/s] and non-malignant breast lesions [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = ( 1.28 ±0. 27) × 10-3 mm2/s, t = 1. 636, P =0. 112,b = 1000 mm2/s: ADC value=(1.20 ±0.23) × 10-3 mm2/s, t = 1.720, P =0. 109] in Group 1. The mean ADC values of malignant breast lesion [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = (1.07 ±0. 15) × 10-3 mm2/s,b = 1000 mm2/s:ADC value = (0. 99 ±0. 14) × 10-3 mm2/s] were significantly lower than that of non-malignant lesion [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = ( 1.37 ± 0. 37 ) × 10-3 mm2/s, t = 4. 803, P = 0. 000; b = 1000 mm2/s: ADC value= (1.30 ±0.34) × 10-3 mm2/s, t =4.227, P =0.000] in Group 2a. The mean ADC values of malignant breast lesion [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = (0. 97 ±0. 14) × 10-3 mm2/s; b = 1000 mm2/s:ADC value = (0. 93 ±0. 14) × 10-3 mm2/s] were significantly lower than that of non-malignant lesion [b =800 mm2/s: ADC value = ( 1.40 ± 0. 39) × 10 -3 mm2/s, t = 4. 227, P = 0. 000; b = 1000 mm2/s: ADC value = ( 1.35 ±0. 36) × 10-3 mm2/s, t =4. 329, P =0. 000] in Group 2b. The diagnostic efficiency was equal( x2 =0. 36,P =0. 5460) whenever b value of 800 or 1000 s/mm2 was selected. The highest sensitivity (97.7%) and NPV (97. 1%) were obtained with b value of 1000 s/mm2 and threshold of 1.25 ×10 -3 s/mm2. Conclusion MR DWI is useful for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions with masslike enhancement rather than nonmasslike enhancement.

MR Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Thyroid Nodules:Correlation with Pathology

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

The Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Cervical Lymph Node Lesions

Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Thyroid Nodules with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Correlation

Application of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Disease

ADC Values in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

Differentiating Laryngeal Carcinomas from Precursor Lesions by Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 T: a Preliminary Study.

On the Utility of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging as a Tool in Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules

Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules larger than 4 cm

Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules

A Comparative Analysis of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Ultrasound in Thyroid Nodules

Diagnostic value of high b-value (2000 s/mm2) DWI for thyroid micronodules

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Thyroid Disease: Application in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Disease

Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging on the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Diseases

Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Lesions with Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Differentiation of Clinically Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Value Of Diffusion-Weighted Mr Imaging Performed With Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values For Cervical Lymphadenopathy

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Breast Lesions at 3.0T MR

Rfov-Dwi and SMS-RESLOVE-DWI in Patients with Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.

MR diffusion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of breast lesions with different enhancement shapes or size and parameter selection

Utility of High B-Value (2000 Sec/mm2) DWI with RESOLVE in Differentiating Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas and Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinomas from Benign Thyroid Nodules.